Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Development (BZD) committee. The Chairman, Michael Gareau Jr. is a strong advocate of the <br />historical district. The developer might as well address the issue now because the chairman is not <br />going to look kindly to that type of lights in the front area. Mr. Koeth had a good idea about <br />moving lights back and indicated lights in the back and historic lights in the front. 1VIr. Brennan <br />suggested if the lights were moved back off the roadway and a flat level metal type cobra light <br />was used with three or four lights on each pole as well as lower wattage bulbs and a lower <br />elevation it should adequately light up the vehicles without the glare. <br />R. Koeth motioned to table Halleen KIA of 27726 Lorain Road their proposal that consists of <br />pole lights. He would like to encourage Mr. Kula to revisit the lighting issue present. The motion <br />was seconded by, W. Spalding role call on the motion: W. Spalding; Yes, R. Koeth; Yes, T. <br />Hreha; yes, and Acting chairman, Brennan; abstain. Proposal Tabled. In the framing of the <br />motion a gentleman by the name of Robert from Dewey Road came forward to indicate that <br />Dewey Road was a dead end street, and suggested if the lights were placed on the empty lots they <br />would effect the residents. 1VIr. Brennan reviewed what had been discussed as the gentleman's <br />hearing aide was not working. The clerk announced that no further notices would be sent out and <br />that the proposal would return on June 8, 1999. <br />IV. NEW DEVELOPIVIENTS AND SUBDIVISIONS: No items. <br />V. COMMiJNICATIONS: No items. <br />VI. COlVMTTEE REPORTS: No items. <br />VII. MINOR CHANGES: No items. <br />VIII. NEW BUSINES S: No items. <br />1X. OLD BUSINESS: <br />1). Olmsted Manor Assisted Living; Mill Road: <br />Proposal Consists of constructing a two-story assisted living building. <br />There will be 39 suites and will be 34,300 square feet. Note: Heard by Planning Commission on <br />3/9/99, and tabled at the 4/27/99, & 5/11/99meeting, the Board of Zoning Appeals meeting on <br />4/1/99, and the Architectural Review Board on 4/21/99. <br />Acting Chairman, Brennan called all interested parties forward to present their proposal. Mr. <br />Suhayda came forward to review the proposal. Mr. Suhayda suggested the materials that had <br />been presented at prior meetings would remain the same. He reviewed that the building has been <br />moved lOfeet as well as reduced in size by 5 feet. He further commented that the Architectural <br />Review Board as well as the Board of Zoning and Appeals had the same concerns as the Planning <br />Commission. He had the original drawings and the new drawings to shown the changes. Mr. <br />Brennan indicated that the Architectural Review Board addressed some planning issues and when <br />ever there are architectural issues that need to be addressed the Planning Commission counts on <br />the Architectural Review Board to review them. He would like to sugaest that the Architectural <br />6