11/04/1999 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

• • CITY OF NORTH OLMSTED s "TOGETHER WE CAN MAKE A DIFI'ERENCE" BOAYtD OF ZONING APPEALS MINU'Y'ES - NOVEMMER 4, 1999 1. ROLL CALL: Chairman, Gomersall called the meeting to order at 7:30PM. PRESENT: Chairxnan, Gomersall, Board Members, T. Koberna, J. Maloney, J. Konold, and W. Kremzar. ALSO PRESENT: Law Director, M. Gareau, Assistant Building Commissioner, T. Rymarczyk and Clerk of Commissions, D. Rote. Chairman Gomersall advised that each case would be judged on the physical situation peculiar to itself, so that in no way is a judgment rendered considered to be a general policy judgment affecting properties and like situations elsewhere. II. REVLEW AND CORRECTION OF MINUTES: The Board of Zoning and Appeals minutes of October 7, 1999 have been submitted for review. J. Konold motioned to approve the October 7, 1999 minutes as submitted. The motion was seconded by W. Kremzar and unanimously approved. III. BUILDING DEPARTMENT REQUESTS: 1. Terrence Kelleen; 6039 Paisley Drive: Request for variance (1123.12). Proposal consists of building a shed. The following variances are required: A 24square foot (.5%) variance for exceeding 2% of rear yard. (Code permits 96sq ft, applicant shows 120sq ft). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section, (1135.02 D1). Chairman Gomersall called all interested parties fonvard, and reviewed the variance requested. Mr. Kelleen came forward to review his request. Chairman Gomersall commented that each of the board members had visited the site and did not have any objections to the request. No further comments were made. J. 1Vlaloney motioned to grant Terrence Kelleen of 6039 Paisley Drive his request for variance (1123.12). Which consists of building a shed and that the following variance be granted: A 24square foot (.5%) variance for exceeding 2% of rear yard. (Code pernuts 96sq ft, applicant shows 120sq ft). Wluch is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section, (1135.02 D1). The motion was seconded by J. Konold and unanimously approved. Variance Granted. In the framing of the motion Mr. Gomersall questioned if the applicant would be placing the shed 10 feet from the property line. Mr. Kelleen remarked "yes." 2. Beitel; 24207 Palm Drive: Request for variance (1123.12). Proposal consists of a swimming pool. The following variances are requested: 1) A 198square foot (6.4%) variance for swimming pool exceeding 20% rear yard coverage, (code pernuts 620sqft, applicant shows 818sqft). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section, (1135.02 D2). Chairman Gomersall called all interested parties forward, and reviewed the vanances requested. Mr. Beitel came fonvard to review his request. Mr. Beitel indicated that he would like to have the variance granted as well as the electrical violation. Mr. Koberna indicated that the board could not address the electrical violation as it was not within the board's jurisdiction. Mr. Gomersall indicated that the pool was too large for the size of the applicant's back yard. Mr. Koberna indicated that the board's picture showed