11/04/1999 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

3) A variance for not meeting the minimum of ten acres, section (1149.02) •. . 4) A use varia.nce for parking is not a pernutted use and there is no main use designated within the city limits, section (1149.03). 5) A variance for not having a 25 foot bufFer between the parking and the boundary lines of the development area, section (1149.09) Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 sections, (1118.02), (1161.02), (1149.02), (1149.03) and (1149.09) . Note: In addition to the above variances a variance will be required from BBCA, for not having a fence arotmd a retention pond, section (1345.02) Chairman Gomersall called all interested parties forward, and reviewed the variances requested. Mr. Lydon, with Zerimba management came forward to review the request. Mr. Lydon indicated that Zerimba management purchased the property from Odot and the lot located 'ul North Olmsted will be used for parking and a retention basin. They would like to be allowed to have the parking spaces and the retention basin on the current lot that is deadlocked. The land is landlocked and is zoned single family residential. The lot is currently 800 feet away from the nearest residents, which are apartments. There will be motulding around the outer edges of the lot to buffer the neighbors. Mr. Gomersall questioned if the moiuiding would be near the 1480 entrance. Mr. Lydon indicated that there would be mounding near 1480. Mr. Koberna questioned how high the mounds would be once in place. Mr. Lydon commented that he believed the mounds would be 8 to 9 feet high, but if the board wanted higher mounds, they would be made higher. Mr. Koberna indicated that he has seen dry basins and they have been filled with weeds and not maintained. Mr. Lydon indicated that the owners will maintain the basin and grass will be planted in it to enha.uce the appearance. The basin is such that it will only be 3 or 4 feet deep and because of its size it will accommodate a lawnmower. Zerimba owns a landscape company and they will maintain the property. Zerunba management will always own the common area. J. Konold moved to grant Fairview Corporate Center; PP# 237-23-024 their request for variance (1123.12). Which consists of a parking lot and that the following variances be granted: 1) A conditional use variance for office parking in a multiple residence district, section (1118.02). 2) A variance for constructing a parking lot without a structure, section (1161.02). 3) A variance for not meeting the muumum of ten acres, section (1149.02) 4) A use variance for parking is not a pernutted use and there is no main use designated within the city lunits, section (1149.03). 5) A variance for not having a 25 foot buffer between the parking and the boundary lines of the development area, section (1149.09). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 sections, (1118.02), (1161.02), (1149.02), (1149.03) and (1149.09). The motion was seconded by T. Kobenia and unanimously approved. Variances Granted. Note: In addition to the above variances a variance will be required from BBCA, for not having a fence around a retention pond, section (1345.02). 10. Yummv Kitchen: 26625 Brookpark Road: Request for variance (1123.12). The proposal consists of a sign package. The following variances are requested: 1) An additional wall sign variance for business logo, (code pernuts l, Applicant requests 2), section (1163.12 A). Note: The applicant is appealing the Building Corrunissions decision to follow the Architectural Review Boards recommendations to not pernut a logo, Section, (1163.16 D). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section, (1163.12 A), (1163.16 D). Chairman Gomersall called all interested parties fonvard, and reviewed the variances requested. Ms. Tang, tlie owner, and Ms. Thai, the landlord came forward to review the request. Mr. Gomersall questioned if the applicants needed the variance for the sign they already had in place. Ms. Tang indicated that the owner wanted to change the name to Yummy Kitchen. Mr. Rymarczyk indicated that the sign that is currently on the building is the one with the logo, the additional sign that they are asking for does not 6