10/07/1999 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Chairman Gomersall indicated that he received a fax from the applicant requesting that his proposal ? be tabled until the November 4, 1999 Board of Zoning Appeals meeting. J. Maloney motioned to table Columbia Land Development of 4647 Great Northern Blvd. until the November 4; 1999 Board of Zoning Appeals meeting. The motion was seconded by J. Konold and unanimously approved. Request Tabled. 2. Mike Lupeu6185 Mckenzie Rd: Request for variance (1123.12). Proposal consists of enlarging the existing garage. The following variances are requested: 1) A special permit to add to a non-conforming building, (1165.02). 2) A 473 square foot variance for garage area, (code permits 750sq ft, applicant shows 1223sq ft, section (1135.02 cl). A 9 foot 6 inch variance for distance from dwelling, (code requires 15ft, applicant shows Sft 61nches, section (1135.02 c2). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 sections, (1165.02) and (1135.02 Cl). Note: l. Existing non-conforming building is 713sqft, 1'.0" plus or minus from the north lot line. 2. Support posts and 2x10 framing identified on drawing as "existing" are recently erected without a permit. Chairman Gomersall called all interested parties forward, and reviewed the variances requested. Mr. Lupeu came forward to review his request. NIr. Lupeu indicated that the building was existing and the roof was flat and leaking so he needed to fix the roof. Mr. Gomersall reviewed that the type of roof was not relevant, only the variances being requested needed to be addressed. Mr. Lupeu indicated that the roof needed to be replaced and he would like to have room for storage. Mr. Gomersall commented that the applicant started the work prior to getting a permit. Mr. Kremzar indicated that he was concerned that the roof would drain into the neighbor's yard. Mr. Lupeu suggested that there was a gutter that will be ran to the ditch. Mr. Conway suggested that the proposed gutter needed to be bigger to handle the water. Mr. Maloney commented that the building itself looked to be right on the lot line and questioned the exact location of the building. Mr. Lupeu suggested that the Darage was 1 foot offthe lot line. Mr. Gomersall questioned how the applicant would maintain the side of the garage. Mr. Lupeu indicated that the building itself is an existing building lze is only replacing the roof and adding to the side of the garage on his property. Mr. Gomersall reviewed that the applicant was taking a chance starting the work before he attended this meeting as the board could deny the request. Mr. Kremzar questioned if the Building commissioner could review what was presently in place. Mr. Conway reviewed the existing structures and indicated that he was not aware of the type of roof that was there before. Mr. Maloney suggested that if a commercial drain was used and tied into a drain it should O.K.. Mr. Conway questioned if Mr. Lupeu would be able to drain the gutters into a downspout and take it out to a ditch. Mr. Lupeu indicated "yes". Mr. Conway suggested putting a condition on the variance that the Engineering Department would have to approve the proposed drainage. No further comments were made. J. Konold motioned to grant Mike Lupeu of 6185 Mckenzie Rd. his request for variance (1123.12). Which consists of enlarging the existing garage and that the following variances be granted after the Engineering Department approves the commercial gutters and drain tie in. 1) A special permit to add to a non-conforming building, (1165.02). 2) A 473 square foot variance for garage area, (code permits 750sq ft, applicant shows 1223sq ft, section (1135.02 cl). 2