Laserfiche WebLink
?v <br />would have aiz effect on has prapee-ty va!ue. Mr. Berie indicated he was concerned abaut the heigiit as vNell as the size af the propased shed. Mrs. Bene irndica:rec? ?hat the proposed size and <br />height of the shed wauld a.ffect the value of all the homes in the development. Mr. Forrester <br />suggested that he was gaing out of his way to nnalce sure it looked clean and nan obtrusive as <br />gossible. He canu-nented tl-ia.t his lot was a very bag 1ot. Mrs. Dol6sh indicated she was concemed <br />aba?? ?ow visible the shed would be. Ivlr. Fori ester indicated thai: the shed wQUld be in the <br />woods and that na doors would :face any neighbUrs. He fui-€he.r comznented that ii the shed was <br />nUt allowed then t?e woazid just have to parlc has vehicles a.long his property. ?/'?xs. Dolesh asPsed if <br />the shed would Iiave twes floors, as the praposed heiglat is 1S feet. :Mr. rorrester irndacated the <br />reas.Qn for the heig?1t was far the :RV. M:r. Gamersall indicated tha.t if Mr. FolTestCr movec€ aut of <br />his hoiile the shed wrould not he removed ajZd that would hctve to be t?ke-n i??? consic?eration. Mr. <br />S1a?.?tery suggested lie was concern.ed havd far back the shed would be in the bac1c. :Mr. Farremter <br />indicated that the frant of the shed vvould extend aut of the vvoods about 6 ar 7 feet rnost af the <br />shed would be in the woads. Mr. Slattery iAldicated that he didn' ?have a prablem if the shed <br />ca.me aut of the woods by 6 ar 7 feet if there ivere some tcind of everareens planted. Thac tWay, it <br />wauldn't be exposed. He would also like to make suz-e the shed doesn't tum into same type of <br />commerczall use. Mr. FoiTester indicated the shed would only be used ?or storage. Mr. Gomersall <br />questioned if there was na drivevvay how wauid the vehacles be put inta iclrie shed. Mx°. Dolesli <br />indicated that Mr. Forrester suggested that, if the shed iuas nat: a.3lawed then l1e woukd just paz-lc <br />the vehicles a1ong the prap?erty line. Mr. Gamersall u7dicated he ctidn't Iike anything more than a <br />24 x 24-.foot shed. Mg. ForrPSter indicated that a 24 x 24-fibot slied woulci do hizn no-good. :E?e <br />zi?:ec?s a. place ta parlc. lais i?totar home. ?r. I'd/?alaneY 5?? r esteci it is ?, ? E? <br />? ?,a,rage being called a shed. <br />A rhed that sbze does Il]CA justflCe tE) the 12e1g]1boTS eWeIl lf fihe1'e 13 Ia11d3C3.?'tjng aTOLl31d the build1ng; <br />it's just too big for a residentz?l area. A 24 x 24-fcaot shed. shauld he adequate enough far <br />storage. Mr. Farrester indicated that a 24 x 24-foot shed was zaat big enaugl7. <br />W. Krenazar rnationed ta approve :D. & W. Forrester of 28112And.orra Drive his request for <br />va,riance (T 1.23.12). Wlueh consists afa shed and i:hat the faliawiilg varianc;es lae gra.nted: <br />1) A 2200 square foot variance f'or accessory building, (code permits 200sq ft, request 2400sci <br />ft), (J 135.02 D 1). <br />2) A 5.1 % variance for rea.r yard cavera.ge, (Cade perxnits Z%, xequest 7. 1%), (1135.02 D1). <br />3) A. 6fbot vaziance foa height of building, (cade permits 1.2 fl, 3-equesf 18 ft); (1135.02 D3). <br />WIfl1CY1 15 !FI v&OIa$1b17 E?f OTCfl'. 90-125 seotian (1135.02 D:I. & D3). :Note: Ehistinn shed to be <br />regnoved when nova buildzng is carrapleted. The motian was seconded by R_ Gar?ersa?l anci <br />???riimously deT11eCI. Va9°IiQLFflces DenIled. ' <br />IV AD3OtJEZNMENT <br />Meeting adjaurned at 1 0:a0pm. <br />ROYJer1: C``.rf1111eP3afl, Chairr?an <br />Rot;e, CIerk: o.f Cainrr?issians <br />12