Laserfiche WebLink
4) A 4'faot vaxiance for lot width on parcel "C" (3912 Coluinbia Rd), (Code requii-es 70'feef). it <br />Wlziclz as in vriolatian af Ord. 90-125 secfian, (1136.05). The rnotaon was secanded by, W. <br />E,remzar and unarauiicausly approved. Vargane" Gmauntedi. <br />2. Jaxn?? Lvnes• 23909 Ambour Drive <br />Request for variance (1123.12). Prapasa3 consists of a slied 1arger tnar? ??owed by ordia?arice. <br />T'?eFd???vving variance is required: <br />A 184 squcire foot vaxiance far excess of 200sqa.r.are.-foat ma??iinum ?lovved ?or acceysoi), <br />buildings. (Code allaws 2% or "347sq ft" ai rear ya.rd, but not tc? exceed 200sc? ?tatal, praposec? <br />shed is 3 84sq ft or 2.2 ! % aE tatal backyard.) <br />Which is in viola.tioi2 a°Ord. 90-125 sectraa7 (l 1.3 5.02 (d-1). <br />Chairznabi Gomersail calied aly ifltc;rested parties farvtrard a.nd reviewed the varian.ces befrig <br />i equested. Mr. Lynes, came Barward to present h,is proposal. Mr. Lynes kfidicated thaf. t?e az?d his <br />spouse woufld rzoiv like Lo have a 12x. 20 shed thaE wou1d be 240 square fee€: total. Tl-ie heig;hti of <br />the shec? Nvould be 12 Baot or 12.5 foat high and wazEld be wit11in the 2% a11awed by code. Mr-. <br />GQmersall indicated tPnat tP?e apphcant would then y-ieed a 40 square foot va,riazice instead of 184 <br />squaFe feet. Mi. Gomervall indicated he thaught t he iieiv size wnu1d 1ae better ai2d aslced if 1:he?e <br />were any furd:her coinmeixts froir the bousd nienlbeF•s or audiersce rncmbers. No furtr7er commenta <br />VireI"e 172ade. <br />:f. lAL :aI0rceY motidned to apprave 3ames :Lynes of 23909 Azaibau.r DTive as amezlded his request for <br />variance (1123.12). W-iich cajzsists ai ashed Iargez- t}Ian a11owed by orc€is1ai1ce and tha:L che <br />fiollov?ing vatiai1ce 1ae graa1ted. A 40 squat-e foot variance Far e>>cess o.f 200sqYZar-e--foot nzaxirnun) <br />hl1owed for accessory buildings. (Cade a11o«s z% or "3475q ft," oF rear yard, but nc?t tca excee,d <br />200sq ft [otal, prc,posed Uhed is 240sq f$..) Whzcli is in violatian of Ord.. 90- f25 sectioil (l 135.02 <br />(d-1). The znot-laii was seconded by, J. Kona1d anc$ unaj-?R)aust}r approvc;d. Vau°UauLce Grrarui,ed. <br />3. James Bla,?,?.?; 4989 Berlcshire Drive• <br />Request fai- valiiance (1.173.12). Propasal cansists of a.dding to the existing garage. <br />"Che follawing variance is requested: <br />Ai2 g'foot va.tiarrce Car frojit ya.rd setbaek, (Code requires SD'ft setback, a.pplica.nt would be aE <br />42'ft). Which as in violatidn af Ord. 90-125 ?ectioi1(113s.as A). <br />ChaBrrrza.n Gaznersall called all interested paa,rties forwa,t-d aI7d revieived the variance being - <br />requesied. Mr. &.Mrs. B11g? carne E'oi-ward tcr present tkjeir propasal. Vfr. Gomersall coinrnente;d <br />thaE he ha.d no qucstions :for the applicant a.nd asked if a.ny board ar audience i-nembers liad any <br />comments. No furElaer camments were rnade. <br />J. Kor.zold motioned to apprave J'anies Bla.gg oF 4988, Berksliire Drive, his ree{uest fo?r variance <br />(I123.12). Whic1l eansists of adcling to the existing ga-aae and that, the foilowing variance be <br />gra.iited. Ari 8'foot variance for fxant yard setback> (Code requires 50'ft setback, applicant vvouid <br />be at. 42'ft). Whach is in vnolation of Ord. 90-125 section (H 35.06 A). T11e iziozian was seconded <br />bY, W. I4reaaizar and unanin,ously a.Pproved. @TaruaRDee Gran6;ed. <br />4. _Ente?prise=Rental A Car• 27521 ti,oraan Raad: <br />Requesf: for variance (1123.12). PTaposal cansists afa, si <br />'" ?? ?acl?a.??. <br />he falloIjda?-g ?T?.?ia.llces are required: <br />1.) A vat-iance -Eor ari additioiaal walI siL,n(Code perinits 1, app]icant request 2)> (1163.12 A). <br />2 <br />`r