06/03/1999 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

1) A 92square foQt variartce far exceeding the 2% rear yard caverage alloweci, (Cade alla«s Z% ' or 48sq fl, app3?cant requests 140sq ft), 2) An 8'faot variance far rear yard setback., (Code reqi.aires 9 Q'ft, applicant shows 2'fioot}. Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 sectaons 1135.02 `D-:() & (D-4). C:'haar??an Camersa11 ca.lled aI 9nterested parties farward and revietved the va.riances being requested. :Mr. Darra.gh, the a.ppIicant's fat??er, aizd M:rs. Faup a cancerned nes`ghbor carr3e farward. Tv[rs. Faup aslc.ed Fuhere the new shed would be placed and af the existing shed would be removed. Mk. Daxragh indicated thac the existing shed would be removed arnd siiawed.Mrs. Faup vaere the propased sFied would be plaeed an'che new site plan. Mrs. Faup suggested everychin?; ii? the C?a?-ragh's hackyaa-c? ?ras near her y?.rd. I?r. G€?l?tersail comrr?ented that the t?oard received?a.n up-dated site plan fram the applncant's father prior to the meeting starting. The alevv plan shova: that the shed would be placed 3 feet frorm. the rear liele and 5 ??et fram the sideyard line. Mr. Konald suggested 5 foot from the f-ear yard line would be better. M:r. Maloney suggested 5faot would allow for dra.inage and maintiena,nce around the shed. Mr. Darragh zndicated his son would accept ma.king, it 5 feet ?'i-oin the rear lot line. Mrs. Faup indzcarea all she sa"T was sheds ancl trailers when she looked ou-L 1?er rear window, a.iid asPced how the shed would be finishc;d. Mr- Gomersall cotnmented that Mr. s. Faup would see the proposed shed ?ywhere it was placed fram her yard. As far as the existing shed it «ill be remotTed ai,c? the proposed shed is erected. Mi-s. Fa.up indicat.ed she would prefer the shed be in line with the bacl{ of her ga.rage so s?e would ns?? ?ave to see it. She asked what color the shed would be, axrd asked if it would be painted. :Mr. Dat-ragh gndicated the shed would not be a hoin?made shed if is a kit. Na Fur-ther carnmetxLs we?e n7ade. J. Malaney motianed to approve Michael Darragh of 24134 Raszta La.rie h$s request.for- va.riance (1123.12). Which cansists oFa shed .and that the followviizg variances be granted as ain etaded. 1}. A 92square?-foot vaaxiarace fior exceedaY1g the 2°'/a rear yard caverage a1lawed, (Code allows.Z% or 48sq ft, applicanx r.-equests 140sq ft), 2). A. 5'f0ot variatice for rear yard setback, (Code requires I a'ft, ap?plicant shaws 2'foot:). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 sections 1135.02 (D-1) & (D-4). The rnotion was secojided by, W. Kremza.r. Ra1.t ca.ll an the motion, J. Maloney; Yes, W. Kresz7zar; yes, T. Kobemci; yes, and. R.- Goniersall; abstain. Motion approved. G'an•?an??? Granted. 7. Dent Wizard• 25021 Lorain Raad: Request tar variance (1.123.12). :Prapasai consists aFa sigm paekage. ? Ttie fallovding vari.ar7ces is requested: 1.} fi124'foot vaaictnce ea place ground sign Vf:bat froti1 side lot Pine, (Code requires 25'ft). 2) A variaiice ta place a graund sign witMn a tr?ano e forined between paiuits an the street right of way luae and nearest edge of an intersecting drive within 35' feet from theiy intersection. Wl-iich is in violation of Ord. 90-125 sections (1.163.12 B). Note: See revised site plan. rI'his proposal,was tabled at the 5/6/99 Board of Zana?g arid Appeals meeting. Chaanna,n Gamersall called all interested pa.s-ties forward and reviewed the varpaBlees beang requested. 1VIr. M:c:Farla.nd, from Fast sig.ms caBne forrward to present the proposal. Mr. Gamersa11 indica.ted he wzshed tha.t the owner of Dent Wizard were present. He cornmented tha,t the reasorv the ca.se was tabled last month was beca.use oE the safety issue aE ihe corraer, vahich lae doesn't seern ta agrec wiCh the board as i,ow he is parking his truck there. Havin; a.ngthing tlaere is a sai'etgj problerrt far children, or vehicles trying to make that. turn. Tfie sign has beeti moved ovez-, but the vehicle shauld raot be parked there, as zt is asa.fety hazard. Mr. Maloney indicated that he 4 tij