06/03/1999 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Which i s inviolataon of Ord. 90W:125 sectgon (113 5.02 :13-1). CSZairnan Gamersall called all interested parties farward and reviewed the va.riances being requested. Mrs. Murrphy, the awner af the property came forvda.rd to pxeseht her pr6posa1. Mr. Goinersall indicated that the board daesn't like tYae sheds to clase to the beaY lat line and asked wlaat the faotage would be from the rear lat ]ine. Mrs. MuFphy indica,tea that the shed vvouPd be a little mc.lr. e than 1.0 feet from the rear lat line. Mr°. Gomersall cammernted that: the st'led would l7e 5 feet in iroin the sideyard lot line a.lsc>, do he ha,d no further questions. He a.sked if there we.re ar?y questians from the board memlaers. No further comments were znade. W. Kj-emzar mcatnoned to a?prove Kenrneth Murphy aiF 6289 Christman Drive; their request for varia.nee (1123.12). Whiclz cora.sisrs of a shed and that the follcrwing war.iance be gr.anted. A 60 sqwa?e faot vaz7ai1ce far exceeding 2% rea.r yard rnaximum, (Cade permits 2% or 80sq :ft, and applicaiit request 140sq ft). W1iicki ns in violation of Ord. 90-125 sectsori (1135.02 :D-1). The inotian was seconded by, 3.M:alaney a,nd unaniiiaously approved. VQai°n???? ??anted. 6.1. Ken1: Smith. 4434? QanterbuQL:Road - Request for varaarrce (1123.12). Propasal consists of a shed. T'he fQllawing variances are reqttired: 1) A 3' ;Eoot varias1ee F'or sideyard setback, (cQde requii-es 5'ft, applicant shows 2'ft. 2) An 8'faat variance.f.car rear yard sef:baek, (Code .requires 10'ft, applicant shoNvs 2'ft. WI-iieli is in vialatiQn of'Ord. 90-125 section (1I35.02 D-4). C1zairrnan Gamersail callecfl a11 in$erested parties :Farvva.t-d a.iid reviewed the vataances - being requested. Mr. & -Mrs. Smttl-i came farvvard to present their praposa.l. 1?.4r. Garmersait suggested that 2 ieet was to close to the rea.r lot liize. Mr. Snnitli indicated tha-t he could move the shed he just didn't want ia waist free spacc. Mr. Kabema suggested that aZ 2feLt from the line the water iunofF from the tap of the shed waula run lY1tCp Mr. Srnith's neigM.bar's yard. Mi°. INIalaney suggested being Sfoot from the sideyard line and S feet Q-ft- the rea.r prQperty line. Mr. Kobe,rna, ccaimnaented that 1oei.ng 5fe?t fi-om tlae rear yard line a.:nd 5 feet from the sideyard line would allow TvEr. Smith the raoxn needed to mairitain the shed as well a.s the yard. Mr, Smgth indicated thafi he ivould place the spled 5 feet from ihe rear lot line and 5feet, in from the sideyard line. Na iurther carnmcnts were ma.de. J. 14!Ialaney motioned to approve Kent Sinith of 4434 Canterbury .Road as amef7ded his request for ? variance (1 123. 12). Which cansists aFa shed and that the following varzance be granted. i.) A,. 5'faot xear yard variance fc?r rear y?ard setba.clc, (Code xecyuirres la'ft, applicant shows s'Pc. Witlz the stipulation thaC the shed vvill be placed 5 feet from the rear property Iine asxa 5 fea in ??-am the sideyamd line as a€;reed. W-fich is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section (1135.02 D-4). 7'he rmotion vvas seconded by, J. Maloney and unanimcausly a.Fproved. Vai°iance c?ranted. 1.2. -Michael fChakirelis: 3411 HunterDrave: Request flor variance (1123.12). Propcasal coilsists of an A/C cvndenserr. T11e follQwing variance is requested: A 3.5 :foat varaa,nce to place A/C candenser in sxdeyard setback, (Cade requires 5ft sadeyard, applicarat shows 1.5 ft). Wlaich is in violatBan af Ord. 90-125 section (1135,07). 7