12/02/1999 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

treat it as any other signage. What the applicants want to do is say that they aren't even going to treat it as signage and they are goina to wait until the court makes a ruling. Ms. 7arvis reiterated that when she talked to the Building Department they talked about it in depth, but didn't explain it to her the same way as Mr. Gareau just did. She indicated that she understood it all now and would figure out the square footage. She suggested that the owners would probably take it down, but would have to move it due to the Code changes and there would be a lot of expense involved. Mr. Gomersall questioned what the total signage requested and what is allowed. Mr. Rymarczyk responded that the applicants are allowed a total of 104 feet of signage. Mr. ' Gomersall indicated that the applicants pole sign is 40 square feet, the wall sign is 32 square feet and an additional wall sign of 32 square feet totals what they want to put in place. Everyone agreed there would be no signage on the north side. Ms. Jarvis indicated that the small sign for the drive-throujh would be removed. At this point, there was a discussion over square footage allowed and not allowed for this business. NIr. Gomersall suggested that the applicants needed approval for a logo and a variance of 40 square feet. Ms. Jarvis questioned if the owner agrees . and the Board approves, can she reface the pole sign. Mr. Gomersall commented that yes, it would be the third variance, to reface the pole sign. J. Maloney motioned to grant Yummy Kitchen of 26625 Brookpark Road their request for variance (1123.12), as amended and agreed upon. Proposal consists of a sign package, and that the following variances be granted: 1. An additional wall sign on the west side of building that will be 32 sq. ft(code permits 1, applicant requests 2), section (1163.12 A) 2. A variance to permit a logo on the south side of building (1163.12 A), (1163.16 D) 3. A variance to allow applicants to reface the existing pole sign (1163.22). The motion was seconded by T. Koberna and unanimously approved. Variance Granted. IV. COMMUNICATIONS: A letter was submitted by J. Maloney, pertaining to the City Codified ordinance (1135.02), paragraph D, Item 2. In which the total area of a detached garage, accessory storage building or other accessory structure, such as a deck, swimming pool, should not exceeds more than 20% of the required area of the rear yard on which such building or structures are located. He would like the Chairman to recommend that Council review aboveground swiinming pools. Note: Said letter is attached to the back of these minutes. J. Maloney motioned to have council review the submitted letter. The motion was seconded by T. Konold and unanimously approved. J. Konold motion to elect R. Gomersall as Chairman. The motion was unanimously approved. R. Gomersall motion to make J. Maloney Vice Chairman. The motion was unanimously approved. T. Rymarczyk questioned if the chairman would like to have a meeting on the 20th of January instead of February. Mr. Gomersall indicated that he would not have a meeting in Jan. The first meeting of 2000 will be the first Thursday of February. 11