Index - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Wluch is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section, 1135.02 D 4, and 1135.02 D 1. Variances Granted 9/7/00 John and Susan Webb (The Construction Team); 27010 Butternut Ridj?e Rd. Request for variance (1123.12). The proposal consists of an accessory structure. The following variances are requested: 1) A 5 foot variance for rear yard setback (code requires 10 ft, applicant shows 5 ft), section (1135.02 (D) (4)). 2) A 2 foot variance for building height (code permits 12 ft, applicant show 14 ft), section (1135.02 (C) (3)). 3) A 200 square foot variance for square foot coverage (code permits 200 sq. ft , applicant shows 400 sq. ft), section (1135.02 (D) (1)). NOTE: A) Existing structure at same location and square feet to be removed B) Pending Landmark Commission approval (meeting date 8/21/00). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section, 1135.02 D 4, 1135.02 C 3, and 1135.02 D 1. Variances Granted 9/7/00 Rainee Simons (Wagner Home Lnnrovement); 24792 Tara Lynn Dr. Request for variance (1123.12). The proposal consists of a 3-season room. The following variance is requested: 1) A 6 foot variance for rear yard setback (code requires 50 ft, applicant shows 44 ft). Wluch is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section, 1135.08 A. Variance Granted 9/7/00 Leonlyd & Jean Javor; 25152 Tara Lynn Dr. Request for variance (1123.12). The proposal consists of installing a shed. The following variances are requested: 1) A 48 square foot variance for maximum square footage for a shed (code pernuts 72 sq. ft, applicant shows 120 sq. ft), section (1135.02 (D) (1)). 2) An 8 foot variance for rear yard setback (code requires 10 ft, applicant shows 2 ft), section (1135.02 (D) (4)). 3) A 3 foot variance for side yard setback (code requires 5 ft, applicant shows 2 ft), section (1135.02 (D) (4)). NOTE: A) It is the Engineering Departments opinion that the shed must be built so as not to infringe on the drainage easement. B) Variance previously granted by the Board of Zoning Appeals 9/4/85 with conditions. Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section, 1135.02 D 1, and 1135.02 D 4. Variances Granted 9/7/00 Joy Gunnett: 4078 Winton Park Request for variance (1123.12). The proposal consists of erecting a 6 foot high fence. The following variances are requested: 1) A 42 inch variance for height of 58 inch fence in rear neighbors front setback (code pernrits 30 inches, applicant shows 72 inches), section (1135.02 (F) (2)). 2) A 58 foot variance for fence over 50% closed (code permits under 50% open, applicant shows over 50% closed), section (1135.02 (F) (1)). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section, 1135.02 F 2, and 1135.02 F 1. Variances Granted 9/7/00 Ameritech with Cicogna Signs; 25170 Lorain Rd. Request for variance (1123.12). The proposal consists of a sign package. The following variance is requested; 1) A variance to alter a non-confonning pole sign (code requires sign be brought into compliance, applicant shows replacing sign face). W1uch is in violation of Ord. 90-125 sections; 1163.10 (C): Any non-confornung sign for a property or premises that undergoes a change of use (pernutted), as fliat term is defined in this 12