Laserfiche WebLink
?,- <br />I <br />reviewing it, is within the Planning Corrunissions discretion. However, the issue had to be voted <br />on tonight in one fashion or another. Mr. Asseff indicated that if the proposal continued to <br />involve the rezoning of sublot's 24 and 25 then as far as this committee was concerned it would <br />not go anywhere. Mr. Tallon felt that was a correct statement. Mr. Dubelko indicated that the <br />Planning Commission was a recommending body to Council and with respect to rezoning this <br />board does not know what Council will do regarding the rezoning issue. Therefore, the board <br />may want to make whatever recommendations they can with respect to the proposal in case the <br />lots are rezoned. If the board makes no recommendations to Council then Council who <br />ultimately has the responsibility to decide whether the lots are rezoned would not have the <br />benefits of your comments. As such this board may want to spend some time on this proposal <br />to make recommendations other than saying they don't like the rezoning proposal. The <br />corrunission may want to make some recommendations with respect to the merits of the <br />proposal itself. Mr. Tallon agreed. He indicated that the proposed entrance on Dewy Road <br />should be eliminated. The amount of lighting was excessive and the earth mounding should be <br />higher to buffer the lights. There should also be an inter-woven fence atop the mounding, it <br />does not have to be connected just inter-woven. Mrs. O'Rourke questioned what the two <br />existing buildings would house. Mr. Suhayda believed they would remain the same as they are <br />now. Mr. Tallon suggested that none of the pole lights should exceed 15 feet and the pole lights <br />closest to the residents should not be any higher then 10 feet high. The renovations on the <br />existing shops is a coat of paint, the board would like the existing buildings to match the new <br />facility. Mr. Koeth questioned if cars would be displayed along all of the Dewy Road owned <br />property. Mr. Suhayda indicated that there would be cars displayed from the corner of Lorain <br />road to the proposed curb cut on Dewy Road. The north side of the curb cut is were the earth <br />mounding would start. Mr. Koeth questioned if there would be ground lights in the mounding. <br />Mr. Suhayda suggested that there would be two ground lights in the area. Mr. Tallon indicated <br />that the pole lights should be removed from the Dewy Road display area and Ballard type <br />ground lights of low wattage should be used. He suggested two (2) or three (3) at the <br />maximum. Mr. Koeth questioned how may display lights would be on the site. Mr. Suhayda <br />suggested that there would be two (2) A type lights on Dewy Road and four (4) along Lorain. <br />Mr. Koeth questioned if the pole lights would be placed just inside the sidewalk. Mr. Suhayda <br />indicated that was correct. Mr. Tallon commented that the A type lights should not be more <br />than 10 feet high as they only need to light up the first row of cars. He questioned what the <br />wattage of the lights would be. Mr. Suhayda indicated that there would be three (3) different <br />wattage sizes used. For the A type lights along Lorain Road the wattage will be 1,000 watt <br />metal halide, B type lights would be 400 watt metal halide and the C type lights would be 250 <br />watt metal halide. Mr. Tallon commented that this was not Jacob's Field and the wattage of the <br />lights should be reduced to a 400 watt maximum. Mr. Asseff questioned why six (6) pole lights <br />would require 1,000 watt lights. Mr. Suhayda invited their lighting expert to answer the <br />question. Mr. Allan questioned how much time the board needed to spend on the proposal <br />since they were against it. Mr. Tallon reviewed why it was in the best interest of the board to <br />address the proposal. Mr. Parsons, the lighting expert, indicated that the reason for the wattage <br />was they were trying to meet the recommendations of the NADA standards. Generally standard <br />practices of inerchandising cars on the front line to roughly 80 to 100 foot candles so that the <br />cars are highlighted so as they are viewed they stand out. They are using forward throw optics <br />so they are directing most of the lighting at the front of the car and into the lot. The interior of <br />` 2