My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04/25/2000 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
2000
>
2000 Planning Commission
>
04/25/2000 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:48:21 PM
Creation date
1/28/2019 4:24:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
2000
Board Name
Planning Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
4/25/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
be left to the city. The Cities main objective is to make it a content neutral policy and what we <br />want our city to look like in the future. This ordinance represents what the City wants. He <br />believes it is reasonable. Mr. Weinstein indicated he is not here presuming to tell Council what <br />the City should be. Mr. Weinstein believes the City would look better with his revisions. The <br />changes are a huge improvement from the old code and that there is a spirit of cooperation that <br />had not been there previously. Mr. Pat Graham came forward to review his suggestions and <br />comments. He indicated the Chamber of Commerce appreciates the opportunity to be heard and <br />will keep it brief. Mr. Graham commends the Law Department, City Council, and the various <br />commissions and boards for working with the Chamber of Commerce. He agreed with the spirit <br />of cooperation. He indicated there are a couple points he would like the Planning Commission to <br />consider before making their final recorrunendation. The first point is on the sight line there has <br />always been the 35-foot triangle from an intersection, now the 35-foot has been inserted "from a <br />driveway." He believes that might be a little excessive. Mr. Graham's second point reiterated the <br />height of signs mentioned by Mr. Weinstein. Mr. Tallon commended everyone who put time and <br />cooperation into the ordinance. The Planning Commission feels the amendment is acceptable, as <br />written in the third revision. <br />R. Tallon motioned to accept the amendments as written in the third revision. The motion was <br />seconded by R. Koeth and unanimously approved. Motion Carried. NOTE: In the framing of the <br />motion C. Allan commended Mr. Graham in his tireless efforts work with the City to help draw <br />up an ordinance that is mutually beneficial and favorable to all. <br />JI. COMIVIITTEE REPORTS: <br />VII. MINOR CHANGES: <br />VIII. NEW BUSINESS: <br />IX. OLD BUSINESS: <br />X. ADJOURNMENT: <br />R. Tallon motioned to excuse the absence of W. Spalding and K. O'Rourke. The motion was <br />seconded by R. Koeth and unanimously approved. <br />The meeting was adjourned at 8:35pm. <br />R. fI'allon, Chai?t7an /' J Kim Vallon, Asst. Clerk of Commissions <br />5
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.