Laserfiche WebLink
i? <br />seconded by D. Spoerke and unauunously approved. Motion carried. The members requested <br />that the clerk read back the motion. The clerk verified, according to her notes, they are <br />recommending that engineering come up with a plan addressing the drainage problem, as this <br />proposal does not adequately address the drainage going to the neighboring properties and to the <br />street. Mr. Burk clarified the proposal creates a hardslup ou susrounding properties. T7ie board <br />would like engiueering to verify where the water is going after it leaves this lot. Councilman <br />Nasher agreed to talk with Service Director Bohlmann and get suggestious on how to solve this <br />problem without causing any more flooding. Mr. Kazak wondered if there could be an answer by <br />the next meeting. Mr. Dunlap noted he is on the board of zoning appeals agenda for April 2. <br />Assistant Building Commissioner Rymarczyk covfuYned this proposal has been withdrawu from <br />the Apri12 agenda because of lack of information. He elaborated the building department has uot <br />yet received elevations and caunot accurately determine the variances without them. "The clerk <br />confiimed legal notices would have to be sent out today. Mr. Kazak prefened to have this <br />resolved by the April meeting. The clerk advised the resideuts that the notification procedure for <br />board of zoning appeals is more limited thau tlus board. Board of zoning appeals requires <br />notification on either side of the proposal, as well as the properties directly belund and across the <br />street from those three properties. The clerk noted although the notification list is more limited <br />everyone is welcoine to come to a public hearing. Mr. Rymarczyk told Mr. Dtwlap, the building <br />department needs all the information in at least two weeks prior to the meetiug date. Mr. Duulap <br />verified the proposed dwelling would be similar to one on Decker Road. In response to Mr. <br />Miller's question, Mr. Dunlap guessed the locatiou to be 5975 Decker Road. Mr. Kazak believed <br />tlus retention would be acceptable, provided the water went somewhere. He reiterated the city <br />should do something to remove this water. <br />V. NEW BUSINESS: <br />VI. OLD BUSINESS: <br />VII. ADJOURNMENT: <br />The meeting was adjourned at 8:30 P.M. <br />R. Burk, Chainnan <br />A. Cornish, Assistant Clerk of Commissions