My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/20/2001 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
2001
>
2001 Board of Building Code Appeals
>
11/20/2001 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:48:31 PM
Creation date
1/28/2019 4:52:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
2001
Board Name
Board of Building Code Appeals
Document Name
Minutes
Date
11/20/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />? <br />CITY OF NOIZTH OLMSTED <br />"TOGETHER WE CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE" <br />SOARD OF BiTII.DING CODE APPEALS <br />MINUTES NOVEMBER 20, 2001 <br />AT 5:30 PM <br />IN COUNCIL CHAlVIBERS <br />ROLL CALL: <br />Chairman, Puzzitiello called the meeting to order at.5:35 p.m. • <br />PRESENT: Chairman, R. Puzzitiello, Board members; R. Klesta, M. Conway- and N. <br />Althen. <br />ALSO PRESENT: Asst. Law Director; James Dubelko, Building Inspectors; T. Rymarczyk <br />and L. Cifranic; Asst. Clerk of Gommissions, S. Solomon. <br />ABSENT: Baard member; P. Engolia. <br />II. RJEVIEW AND CORRECTfON OF MINUTES: <br />The minutes from November 5, 2001 have been submitted for review. <br />M. Conway motioned to approve the Board of Building Code Appeals minutes dated <br />November 5,. 2001 as written. The motion was seconded by R. Klesta and was <br />unanimously approved: Approved. <br />III. BLTILDING DEPARTMENT REQUESTS: <br />Ms. Hanne Boger; Rasmussen Homes <br />Proposal consists of a request to revoke contractors registration in the City of North <br />Olmsted in accordance with section 1317.07. <br />Chairman Puzzitiello called all interested parties forward to review the case. Ms. Boger <br />came forward. Mr. Puzzitiello questioned if she was the contractor. Ms. Boger replied <br />yes. Mr. Puzzitiello questioned if her company was licensed with the state or if she ha,d a <br />state number. Ms. Boger replied no. Mr. Puzzitiello questioned how she took care of her <br />taxes. Ms. Boger indicated that she thought he meant a contractor license. She is licensed <br />with the State, but she doesn't have a contractors license with the State. She indicated that <br />she had come here tonight to ask for a continuance. She received the notice the day prior <br />to this meeting and she had no time to prepare. She is in no position to answer questions. <br />She spoke with Tom Rymaxczyk and asked if she could have a continuance. He told her <br />that she would have to come here tonight in person to ask for a continuance. She is totally <br />not prepared to answer questions and didn't have time to confer with anyone about this. <br />She just did no't want to not show up. Mr. Puzzitiello indicated that they would postpone <br />it. ' 1V1r. Rymarczyk questioned if there was any way the board could. proceed with it, <br />because there is an excavated area with a homeowner who is distressed. Mr. Puzzitiello <br />questioned how they were going to protect that hole and if the weather gets bad, how are <br />they going to protect the footers. Ms. Boger indicated that she would propose to have a <br />completely different company take over the building. She is not trying to avoid action; she <br />is just not prepared. Mr. Klesta questioned if this was just a big open hole in the ground <br />right now. Mr. Puzzitiello indicated that the footers are in and the foundation is partly up
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.