Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1 <br />CITY OF NORTH OLMSTED <br />'"TOGETHER WE CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE" <br />BOARD OF BUII..DING CODE APPEALS <br />MINUTES OC'TOBER 18, 2001 <br />IN COUNCIL CHAMBER5 <br />5:30 P.M. <br />I. ROLL CALL: <br />Chairman, Puzzitiello called the meeting to order at 5:30pm. <br />PRESENT: Chairman, R. Puzzitiello, Board members; P. Engoglia, R. Klesta, M. <br />Conway and N. Althen. - <br />ALSO PRESENT: Asst. Building Commissioner, T. Rymarczyk and Asst. Clerk of <br />Commissions, S. Solomon. <br />II. REVIEW AND CORRECTION OF MINUTES: The minutes of June 21, 2001 <br />Board of Building Codes Appeals minutes have been submitted for approval. <br />P. Engoglia motioned to approve the Board of Building Code of Appeals minutes <br />dated June 21, 2001 as written. The motion was seconded by R. Klesta and <br />unanimously approved. <br />III. BUILDING DEPARTMENT REQUESTS: <br />James Dittebrand• 6122 Stearns Rd. . <br />Proposal consists of fence. Built split rail fence, but attached unapproved type of <br />wire fence constituting a double fence. <br />Chairman Puzzitiello called all interested parties forward to review the request. The <br />homeowner, James Dittebrand, came forward to review the request. Mr. Puzzitiello <br />questioned if he had anything to say. Mr. Dittebrand replied not really. Mr. <br />Engoglia indicated that he thought it should be allowed to stay the way it is. Mr. <br />Klesta indicated that he consulted with the building department and this is definitely. <br />an unapproved type of fencing that was used. His problem is, what would be to stop <br />other people from using that application in a different series. Last year someone <br />tried to put deer fencing up, what would stop them from using that fiberglass mesh <br />with wood pickets. There are set codes on what we do allow in North Olmsted and <br />what we do not allow and there are reasons for that. Mr. Conway suggested that the <br />board is not here to punish anyone. 1VIr. Dittebrand questioned what else he could <br />put up to keep his dog in the yard. 1VIr. Klesta indicated that originally he pulled a <br />permit for chain link. Mr. Dittebrand replied right, then . he had it extended. He <br />- spoke with a woman in the building department and he told her he was going to a <br />split rail. He had the temporary wire fence up before,, then he built the split rail <br />fence. He has had problems with kids coming up to the house and ripping the screen <br />off, the glass block window. So he put the fence and some dogs doors up and since <br />then he has had no problems. . He believes the split rail eosmetically looks better than <br />a chain link. Mr. Althen agreed. Mr. Engoglia again commented that he would let <br />this stay_ Mr. Klesta questioned what other types of wire or chain fences are <br />approved by North Olmsted. Mr. Rymarczyk indicated that there are a few out <br />there, he believes that he might even have what is approved by the City. Mr.