My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06/07/2001 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
2001
>
2001 Board of Zoning Appeals
>
06/07/2001 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:48:37 PM
Creation date
1/28/2019 5:07:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
2001
Board Name
Board of Zoning Appeals
Document Name
Minutes
Date
6/7/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
restaurant here with no signage. Mr. Olson commented that they wouldn't, because it will be represented <br />in the documents what their rights are. Mr. Koberna questioned who in their right minds are going to <br />sign a lease with you guys if they can't get what they want. Mr. Conway indicated that part of what this <br />board is trying to achieve is to get every property owner, and you guys are in control of the property, to <br />come forward and say here is my site and here is what I want to do and get an approval for it, so they're <br />not coming back with sign after sign. It sounds like no, we are going to divorce this from the other <br />building even though we control it. Mr. Olson replied no. Mr. Gareau questioned the square footaje <br />calculation for the total area of signage for the pylon sign, didn't that include the out building. Mr. <br />Conway replied, as far as he knows, yes. Mr. Gareau suggested what you ought to do is indicate that this <br />is for the total signage and the variance is with the understanding that there is not going to be any other <br />ground sign. So, when somebody comes to you and says we want a ground sign, they'll have to say oops, <br />our variance was predicated upon there being no other ground sign. There is nothing stopping them from <br />asking, but the City will drudge up this thing and say hey, we told you. The request for the variance be <br />approved with the understanding that the proposal incorporates all of the ground signage that is going to <br />be incorporated for the entire development and it's not intended that there will be any other variances <br />granted in the future for additional ground signs. Mr. Maloney indicated that this motion is conditioned <br />on the request as cited by Ivlr. Gareau. <br />J. Maloney motioned to grant Tops Markets of 26666 Brookpark Ext. their request for variance <br />(1123.12). Which consists of ground signs and that the following variances be granted: <br />7. An 8 foot variance for excessive height for ground sign #V, (code permits 12 ft. applicant shows 20 <br />ft). <br />8. A 178.5 square foot variance for excessive square footage for ground sian #V, (code permits 50 sq. <br />ft. applicant shows 228.5 sq. ft.). <br />Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 sections, 1163.26-C. <br />NOTE: 1. See new position of ground sign #V on revised site plan dated May 30, 2001. <br />2. Top's was granted variance requests 1 through 6 at the May 3, 2001 Board of Zoning Appeals <br />tneeting, <br />3. The request for the variance is approved with the understanding that the proposal incorporates all of <br />the ground signage that is going to be incorporated for the entire development and it is not intended that <br />there will be any other variances granted in the future for additional ground signs. The motion as <br />seconded by W. Kremzar and was unanimously approved. Variances Grantecd 6/7/01. <br />8. Noa-thern Ohio Golf Association; 5840 Canterbury Iad. <br />Request for variance (1123.12). The proposal consists of 2 story golf office/administration building. <br />The following variance is requested: <br />1) A 7 ft. height variance for height of structure (code pernuts 30 ft., applicant shows 37 ft.). <br />Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section, (1136,04). <br />Chairman Maloney called all interested parties forward to review the request. The oath was administered <br />to Bob Wharton, the Executive Director for N.O.G.A., and Matt and Barb Simoncic of 5770 Canterbury <br />Rd., neighbors, who came forward to review the request. Mr. Maloney questioned if Mr. Wharton would <br />explain to the board what he was trying to do. Mr. Wharton indicated that they are only asking for one <br />variance. They are building a 2-story golf office on the Canterbury Rd. address. They are trying to <br />match the buildings that exist in Viewpoint. They are asking for a variance on the height. To keep the <br />same pitch and angle on the roof as the other surrounding buildings they need 37 ft. and from what he <br />understands the existing buildings in the development are 35 ft. high. Mr. Maloney indicated that he just <br />wants to maintain the profile of the development. Mr. Maloney questioned if the neighbors had <br />questions. Mr. Simoncic indicated that he would just like to see where the building was going up. Mr. <br />6
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.