Laserfiche WebLink
anything, why we wouldn't as a city want to showcase how it can be done properly is beyond him. This <br />new building will be there 70, 80, 90 years, more than likely, and so the decisions that this team is making <br />will influence how people react to retention and detention throughout the city. He feels the designers <br />have been given enough opportunity to look at it and do it a different way. He is not an insurance carrier <br />but there are plenty of people who do put in those ponds. Most apartment buildings do and they build <br />walkways around them and brick walls that are dynamic. This site will ultimately be as big because he <br />hopes they are planning retention for some of the future activities that will go on at this location, and that <br />it is not limited. Mr. Hunsicker said the retention is designed for another 5-6,000 square feet onto the <br />building area itself. Mr. Zergott asked how Westlake can have open retention or detention such as at the <br />hospital and not worry about liability. It is a beautiful walking area. The water is right there. Mr. Yager <br />said it happens all over the cominunity and people are selective about what they think is safety. If it's nice <br />enough aesthetically, it seems to be worth it with regard to safety. Maybe there is a clause in the liability <br />insurance. It seems to him that every community and every site takes that on by choice. They are not <br />held or handcuffed to what their insurance carrier tells them. There are oodles of sites that are able to do <br />this. His greatest fear is if they did have the water and they put a fence around it, it looks horrendous. <br />The Mayor pointed out there is a site that has that set up on Dover Center, the Westlake library. Mr. <br />Yager said that is not a designed pond; it is a utilitarian pond. They just put a fence around it. He can <br />show example after example of how this would be an enormous benefit to the whole city hall complex. <br />He thinks the landscape people and the designers are capable of doing this. If these are the choices they <br />made, he thinks it is a missed opportunity. It's one of the few things he is disappointed in. It doesn't <br />mean that he won't accept it, he is just disappointed because it is a great opportunity for city hall to show <br />applicants how to make this city be better very easily. He added they have a design team in place that can <br />do it. Mr. Hunsicker said the other aspect to the site is the lighting. He said the plans show by their <br />placeinent of lights on the interior part of the site, they have near zero foot-candles along the edges. He <br />referred to the plan and pointed to two lights that will have the designed cutoffs on them. The <br />calculations were run without them. The light poles in the center are going to have brackets for the <br />hanging of banners for community and library events. They will augment the lighting over at the book <br />drop area with exterior down lighting. Mr. Zergott asked how trucks will come in by the dumpster area. <br />Mr. Hunsicker indicated they will come in the opposite direction. They will come straight in and then go <br />back out. The building will have sconces at the door to enhance the effect of the building. The building <br />up lighting will be at the corners. The intention there is to wash the face of the building and highlight the <br />corners. Along the walkway, they have lighting, as well as in the plaza area. They want to light the site <br />but not over-light it or over-power the neighbors' areas. He said the elevations have evolved since the <br />board first saw them. The Lorain Road side has not changed much. The Butternut Ridge side has <br />changed quite a bit. They had a rounded element originally. They received comments indicating people <br />wanted the two sides to look similar to each other. They reworked the plan and the elevations to get the <br />two sides to work well and yet still get some of the covering that they wanted from the elements, and still <br />meet the requirements of the'library system. Mr. Hunsicker mentioned the materials to be used. He said <br />one change is the cornice areas. They switched it to a siding material that is meant to look like a board on <br />board type siding with a bead to give as flat an appearance as possible, without going to big sheets of <br />aluminum or wood, something that would be a maintenance issue. They designed everything keeping in <br />mind the long-term maintenance of the different materials. The chose two different types of brick, one is <br />a base bid and one is an alternate to get competitive pricing. They did not want to leave it up to a <br />contractor to tell them they are getting a certain brick. They want control over that. They did the saine <br />with the roofing shingles. He said they have stone accent banding throughout the building. There is some <br />metal roofing at the book drop area. On the side elevation there is a smaller,porch area with metal roofing <br />as well. They have not altered the design tremendously because the image was set early on. He showed a <br />rendering of enlarged elevations of the trash enclosure area where the generator and transformer have <br />decorative metal fencing and gates. On the opposite side of the wall they had to have a decorative metal <br />fence in place because of the generator and the movement of air through the enclosure. He referred to a <br />12