Laserfiche WebLink
interact into the future. Mr. Koeth said as part of the agenda for the May 28th meeting, they will need <br />to cliange the order of business. <br />R. k;oeth motioned to amend Article II, Section 5(Order of Business) as allowed in Article VII of the <br />Planning Commission Rules and Regulations to include in the order of business as item III, <br />Administrative Submittal for the May 28, 2002 agenda only. The motion was seconded by W. <br />Spal.ding and unanimously approved. <br />NIr. Koeth asked if Mr. O'Malley had anything else to address. Mr. O'Malley pointed out that City <br />Council passed an ordinance last week allowing the Mayor to enter into a contract with a planning <br />consultant, George Smerigan. He understands that the Law Director has had some discussions with <br />him about having him come in to address the Planning Commission, It is hoped he will be available <br />on Dnay 281h. He has already testified in the case and knows the site well. They anticipate he will be <br />able to deliver a report and make some recommendations. Mr. Koeth asked for confirmation that he <br />will be the consultant on Parcel E. Mr. O'Malley indicated that is correct. He said what is before the <br />Cortimission is a remand of a re-zoning issue. They don't have an applicant, but they have a matter <br />that has been referred, or remanded by a court. The Planning Commission would then proceed and is <br />authorized by the code to initiate re-zoning requests. It is comparable to the Schmidt matter. Mr. <br />Spal.ding brought up the Supreme Court ruling. Mr. O'Malley indicated the Ohio Supreme Court <br />rulirig would have more bearing on them than the U.S. Supreme Court's Lake Tahoe decision. Mr. <br />Koeth suggested.that the board members refrain from commenting or giving an opinion at this point. <br />Mr. Hreha asked that they give serious consideration to the structure of their agenda. His thought is to <br />mo?-e New Developments and Subdivisions ahead of Building Department Requests. He added that <br />ofte;n times the lot splits and consolidations are for residents and it is not right to have a resident sit for <br />so long. The board members agreed. Mr. O'Malley indicated the planner could come to the next <br />meeting if they want him to be there. He said the Law Director indicated to him that it would be <br />appi-opriate for the planning consultant to make his report in a public meeting. The Law Director <br />didn.'t expect the planning consultant would be privy to executive session. Mr. Hreha asked if there is <br />a way to let the planner know that the Flanning Commission would welcome his report. Mr. Koeth <br />said once they meet him they can let him know what input they would like to get. Mr. O'Malley <br />poin.ted out they will have to review the ordinance, the scope of the work, and the contract that is <br />being executed for this planner. He said he does not think the Planning Commission is going to be <br />able to expand the scope of his work. Mr. O'Malley added he is coming in to go over Parcel E. 1V1r. <br />Koeth suggested that Mr. O'Malley let the planner know that the board would like some kind of <br />outl:ine on what he will discuss so they can ask questions. Mr. Koeth also asked for some kind of <br />back;ground on what he has been involved in with Parcel E so they can better understand where he is <br />coming from. Mr. O'Malley added an analysis of the master plan as it relates to this issue would be a <br />gooii idea. The opinions the planner has might need to be supported in court again. <br />Chairman Koeth mentioned the last meeting when they had a quorum but not a majority vote. He <br />indicated he wants everyone to know that they need a majority of Planning Commission members, <br />four members, for a vote. Mr. O'1Vlalley said if they do not have four members, they do not have a <br />quorum to proceed. He pointed out that the board can advise an applicant of the rules so they have an <br />option to come back. Mr. Koeth excused the absence of Mr. Allen. He then pointed out that if a <br />person is not present at a meeting, he/she may still vote to approve the minutes of that meeting. Mr. <br />O'M:alley confirmed it. Mr. Rymarczyk mentioned there are two Shell gas stations that are bringing in <br />a submittal for minor changes. He asked if the Planning Commission wants to hear them at the next <br />meeting. Mr. Koeth said he is familiar with it and it is fine for them to come in. <br />10