My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/18/2003 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
2003
>
2003 Board of Building Code Appeals
>
12/18/2003 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:49:17 PM
Creation date
1/28/2019 7:33:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
2003
Board Name
Board of Building Code Appeals
Document Name
Minutes
Date
12/18/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />CITY OF NORTH OLMSTED <br />"TOGETHER VVE CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE" <br />BOARD OF BUILDIlNG CODE APPEALS <br />AGENDA - DECEMBER 18, 2003 <br />lN COUNCIL CHAMBERS <br />5:30 P.M. <br />1. ROLL CALL: Chairman Puzzitiello called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. <br />PRESENT: R. Puzzitiello, M. Conway, N. Althen, and P. Engoglia <br />ALSO PRESENT: Assistant Building Commissioner T. Rymarczyk, Assistant Clerk of <br />Commissions A. Kilbane <br />ABSENT: R. Klesta <br />II. REVIEW AND CORRECTION OF NIINTJTES: <br />The Board of Building Code of Appeals minutes for the continuance meeting held August 21, <br />2003 and the meeting of September 18, 2003 have been submitted for approval. <br />M. Conway made a motion to approve the minutes of August 21, 2003 and September 18, <br />2003. The motion was seconded by P. Engoglia and unanimously approved. <br />III. OLD BUSINESS: <br />IV. NEW BUSINESS: <br />1. Jerrv Krankovich, 5582 Uuail Run Drive (WRI). 3) <br />Applicant is seeking a permit for a new fence. <br />(1369.03 (a) (3)) General requirements for fences: Where a neighbor has already installed <br />a fence along a property line, an additional fence will not be permitted. <br />Mr. Krankovich came forward to address the board and discuss his request. He presented photos <br />and a site plan to the board members to illustrate what he is trying to do. He wants to fence in his <br />back yard and as he understands the city code, because the neighbor behind him has an existing <br />fence, he cannot put a fence against that one. He said there is a 6 foot fence on the north side <br />belonging to his other neighbor. He has no problem with that. His concern is the fence to the rear. <br />He has a retaining wall and there is a significant elevation difference and the retaining wall height <br />varies anywhere from 2 1/2 to 3 feet. He would not put a fence up against their fence. There is a <br />gap between his retaining wall and the existing fence. It varies from 10 1/2 to 11 inches. It drops <br />down to 2 1/2 to 3 feet. He has children and pets and his fiancee also has a dog. He does not want <br />anyone falling down or getting stuck in there. He is concerned about safety. It is basically a <br />trench that runs the length of the back wall so he is asking for a variance. He said he almost <br />wishes it was equal height because it would save him the expense of putting up additional fence <br />but the height differential makes it a safety concern and aesthetic concern. He pointed out if the <br />variance is approved his fence will be the same on three sides instead of just two. The fence he <br />proposes is wood and will be similar to what is there. Mr. Engoglia asked for clarification on <br />where the proposed fence will be in relation to the existing fence. Mr. Krankovich referred to the <br />plans and said the fence would be back by the retaining wall on the grass side. Mr. Engoglia <br />asked how much room will be between his neighbor's fence and his proposed fence. Mr. <br />Krankovich said it will be about 1 1/2 to 2 feet. Mr. Engoglia said if it is 2 feet, he has no problem <br />with the proposal. Mr. Krankovich said his original plan would be to put it up against the <br />retaining wall just so there is not additional weeds and material to trim. Mr. Engoglia said if he <br />goes up against the retaining wall, he will not be able to get back there for maintenance. Mr.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.