12/08/2003 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

with a whole different proposal and it's weaker and weaker. The money is not an issue yet. The first issue is does the city back this. If so, get the energy flowing. Mr. Barker said the commission shares Mr. Yager's concerns and thoughts but they keep falling between a rock and a hard place. He indicated that the Mayor said on November 12th because of financial conditions he finds it would be difficult to redirect funds. A letter from the Building Commissioner said the acceptance of this building should be seriously weighed because of the financial conditions of the city. He said Mr. Lang had a meeting with the Mayor and the Mayor seems to be in favor. He added that the commission asked for a meeting with the Finance Committee, and they seem to have the sympathy of Council, seem to have support from most of Council, but again the bottom line was how much money is it going to cost and should they be pouring money into the building. He said Mr. Lang has talked to more people this week and gotten more quotes. What they originally thought would cost $30-50,000 is now leaning toward $100,000, for moving and reinstalling. NIr. Yager said they need to go to Halleen and say this is what the city wants. Mrs. Lord pointed out they already denied the demolition permit. Mr. Barker said the way their chapter is set up, they can deny and it only gives them a moratorium of six months. Basically, the owner can do whatever he wants. Mr. Yager asked on what application it was denied. Mr. Lang said the application specifically requests permission to demolish a building on permanent parcel 232-10-059. No explanation needs to be given to the commission regarding future use for the site. Mr. Barker said Halleen's answer was it will be returned to its natural state. Mrs. VanAuken said the board can say no but they don't have the teeth to keep someone from doing something like this. They can only go by moral persuasion. She talked to a group of third graders recently about the history of North Olmsted. They had a slide of that building with a man standing there with a horse and wagon, delivering the mail. The teacher asked what will be done with the building and she was sad to learn nothing can be done about it. Mrs. VanAuken said it seems to lack somebody with fire in their eyes saying, "we can't let this go, and someone who can get the community thinking about ways to save it. Mrs. Davis said the same teacher had mentioned that her husband has been active in something in Lorain County and they got funds of some kind. Mr. Lang asked Mrs. Davis if she knew how long it took to get those funds. Mrs. Davis said she does not know. Mr. Lang said a few months back Mr. Dailey mentioned a house on Broadview and Snow Rd. that was being threatened with demolition. The Ohio Historical Society brought that up as an example of something that could be done. It took two and a half years to come up with the money to inove the house to a safe location. He said the board is kind of hamstrung because unless there is a legal hold that goes beyond a limited period of time to buy time to come up with the funds, grants take up to a year and a half, and North Olmsted is not eligible for many grants, especially historical, because it is not a CLG. He said they would only be eligible for foundation type grants. Mrs. Lord said they have met with Mr. Halleen numerous times and he is well aware the commission does not want the building knocked down. The board has offered many suggestions for the use of the building and there is no discussion. Mr. Barker said they feel that February 12th the wrecking ball will be there. Mrs. Lord said that Mr. Halleen has said he has someone interested in buying it. Mr. Lang said he is hoping to know by the end of the week exactly how feasible the move is and what the cost estimate would be for the move. A foundation will vary between a crawl space at $5,000 and a full basement of $10,000. A new furnace will cost $4,000 if put on a slab, including new duct work which could be dainaged during the move. Mr. Yager said he is not here to suggest they move the building. He is here to suggest keeping it. Moving it costs money and moving it takes it away from its natural state. He thinks the energy should be put toward keeping it where it is. If this commission can't achieve something like that, what's the basis of the commission? Someone has to get behind the emotional ball. Clearly, everybody in the city says they don't want to spend the money on it. That is different than emotion. It has to happen in January if the wrecking ball can come in February. He said they should go to Council and see if some kind of vote can be put up where the city has a say in it. It is a city building first and foremost. It is visually and historically a part of the city. Mr. O'Malley said it may be possible to extend the six month moratorium. There could be further review. He mentioned the situation in Lakewood and said when does the government use its authority to take land. The issue is would the six month moratorium be extended and beyond that, then what. It might give the city more time to seek the 4