Laserfiche WebLink
the board also asks that they try not to wait for the Coinmission to find the people. Whatever the <br />application process would be, it would go to the Mayor. Mr. Barker added that the Mayor makes the <br />majority of the appointments. Mrs. O'Rourke agreed and said applications would go to the Mayor's office <br />as he makes the appointments. Mr. Barker said he thinks the definition was referred to the Law Director. <br />He thinks it also came up at his ineeting that if anybody can't find those specific credentials, they would <br />look at experience. They also noted that everyone must be a registered voter to be on the Commission. <br />That brings the stack of people down. They are saying you must be a resident, which is what the board <br />would expect, but they are also talking about special interest, experience and knowledge of historical <br />architecture. With that argument they brought up that Mrs. Lord, Mr. Lang, and Mrs. VanAuken have <br />been on the Commission since its inception. That falls into the criteria. There are also 2 appointments by <br />Council and 1 by Planning Commission. That is where the list has to come from. He feels that if they try <br />to remember the gentleman's name on Butternut, he would suggest that they approach him about <br />attending a ineeting so they can talk to him and see if he is interested. The Clerk of Commissions can <br />send a letter to him and at least the Commission is doing its part. Mr. Corell said if he heard Mr. Dubelko <br />correctly at that ineeting when he addressed the 4 criteria, he is looking to find something that is <br />certifiable. When you are talking about an architect, or anything like that, you are looking for a degree <br />and registration. He said Mr. Dubelko also made the remark that it would be difficult in a city of 34,000 <br />people to convince the "authorities that be" that no such person exists if they are going to go to something <br />else. He said he thinks Mr. Dubelko laid the gauntlet there but no inatter what the board may think of <br />someone's skills, if they are not degreed in it, it may not work, because he tried to make the argument that <br />"professional" is if they earn more than 50% of their income from it. He does not think that will apply <br />here if he heard Mr. Dubelko correctly and he thinks that is the advice the Mayor will be given. He <br />agrees and said the guy on the corner of Revere and Butternut is fabulous. Maybe he has a degree in <br />something that is related. Mrs. VanAuken said she wants to know who made up the list and asked why it <br />can't include something like a contractor. Mrs. Lord replied because they voted on it in the election. <br />Mrs. VanAuken said it didn't say that when they voted on it. It didn't say what the occupations were <br />going to be. That has been drawn up since. Mr. Lang said it has not been drawn up since. The Law <br />Department in their preparation of the charter amendment drew its information from the application for <br />Certified Local Government and that criteria is very specifically spelled out in there. They took the <br />application for the CLG, put it into a ballot language and then submitted it to the voters so you are not <br />going to see the entirety of what it is you are voting on but it did say that in what you did vote on that <br />there would be a change in the criteria for the makeup of the composition of the Landmarks Commission. <br />It wasn't that specific on the ballot but it was by inference. Mr. Barker said the ballot language was, "to <br />establish the requirement that certain members of the City Landmarks Commission meet specific <br />professional qualifications and do otherwise satisfy criteria for certification by the Ohio Historical <br />Society." Mr. Lang said they are the ones that set the criteria of architect, historian, archeologist, etc. <br />Mrs. Lord said we have been given a charge. The other thing that was asked requested that the board put <br />an article or request in the local newspapers so that they are on record for showing good faith in asking <br />someone to come forward. If we do that, and we do our internal search for people we believe might ineet <br />this criteria, if at that point in time we can't come up with 2 people in this city then we can revert back to <br />someone who has less than a professional criteria but certainly is part of a profession that could prove <br />helpful. She said all of us can remain if there is no one in the city that has the credentials who wants to <br />be on the Commission. Mr. Lang said, correct. Mrs. Lord said they still could check with people they <br />feel may be qualified to bring something to the group. Mr. Lang said in preparation of that, he went to the <br />Chamber of Commerce last week. He asked if they have a directory of businesses or individuals that are <br />engaged in business that would be appropriate to this particular appointinent. He was informed there is <br />no such directory. They are in the process of compiling a directory and they are as far as the "A's". Mr. <br />Lang asked if they got to "architect." The woman he spoke with asked if he had a copy of the old Orange <br />Line. He received from her a copy of the Orange Line directory of architects that are listed in the phone <br />book. It could be a matter of calling each one of these architects to find out if they are residents and if so, <br />4