Laserfiche WebLink
subanission of the applica.tioii. Fallowing review, the recommendation will be referred to <br />the Architectural Revieva Board for its recommendations at its next regutarly scheduled <br />aneeting, and then to the Flanning Commission for the Commission's review. <br />Rationale: I believe a joint revaeEV between the Btailding Official and Director of Pla.nning would <br />create a more timely a,nd efficient review process. Ann internal process can be set up in which <br />botli individuals meet to revietv agplications, offeruag opportunities to discuss relevant pla.nninc, <br />and building issues vvithin a more streamlined schedule. <br />Recoma??????ion 2 <br />Section 1126.03 (d) should be modified to read: <br />(d) The Build'ang Official or the Iairector of Planning may request, in the interest of <br />expediting the review process anci zn a.-Liticipa.tion of a Plallning Cot-nrrqission requirement <br />thez-eof, the cornment or report of any appropriate City official or depaa-trnent and shall, <br />pn the event tha.t development proceeds under subsection (c), provid.e a report a.nd <br />recomn'eradation to the PT?nnang CornmPSSion and the Baa.rd of Zonznb Appea,ls csn 'uhe <br />va?iances requestedl. <br />Rationale: The substitution of the word "ar" -v,,7i!l at?ow eiflner ihy?ivadual to rec???st the <br />c.?mma??? of a??? ap??opraate City official c? ????arta-?ent.