Laserfiche WebLink
agrees with what the residents said. He said he does not believe this is the correct place to construct the <br />tower. There are other options available and they need to take a harder look at those. He agrees with <br />getting O.D.O.T. in and having conversations with them. Mr. Spalding said he would echo those <br />cominents and O.D.O.T. should be here. They need to see the lease agreement and need to see what <br />O.D.O.T. will do directly. He told Mr. Block that he has been given many questions and <br />recommendations by the audience. He said they need to go back to the drawing board and examine the <br />entire proposal. He does not believe they will get an approval from the Planning Commission based on <br />what has been said. <br />W. Spalding made a motion to table the matter until Cingular can come back with a proposal that <br />encompasses all that was discussed at this meeting. The motion was seconded by J. Lasko. Roll <br />call on the motion: J. Lasko, C. Allan, W. Spalding-Yes, anci T. Hreha-No. Motion to table the <br />proposal carried. <br />An audience member asked if the residents will be notified when the proposal comes before the board <br />again. Mrs. Kilbane indicated notices will be sent out when the applicant returns. Mr. Allan asked for a <br />point of order. He said there are only four of the seven members present and there are three "yes" votes <br />and one "no" vote on the motion. He asked where they stand. Mr. O'Malley said it is his opinion that <br />the three votes carry the motion. The motion to table is approved. He then asked if the applicant has <br />any expectation as to when he might return. Mr. Block indicated he has a meeting tomorrow and he will <br />try to get an answer. Mrs. Kilbane indicated the next meeting is scheduled for July 22. The month of <br />August is a vacation month for the board. The board will then meet on September 9 and September 23. <br />Mr. Block said depending on what they feel is obtainable as far as additional information, there is a good <br />chance they won't come back until September. <br />IV. NEW DEVELOPMENTS AND SUBDIVISIONS: <br />V. COMMUIVICATIONS: <br />Cuyahoga County Planning Commissions proposed work program packet received <br />Mr. Spalding commented that with only four members present he does not believe they should address <br />this issue. <br />VI. CONIlVIITTEE REPORTS: <br />VII. MINOR CHANGES: <br />VIIL NEW BUSINESS: <br />IX OLD BUSINESS: <br />1. Ordinance No. 2003-47 <br />An ordinance to establish a new revised procedure for development plan review and to authorize the <br />assessment of costs for expert consultation by amending sections 1126.02, 126.03, and 1126.04 (d) of <br />chapter 1126 of the Planning and Zoning Code entitled "Commercial and Other Building Permits", as <br />amended. Note: Planning Commission tabled on 6/24/03. <br />Mr. Spalding asked Mr. O'Malley if the board should vote on the ordinances. Mr. O'Malley said the <br />board can continue to study them or vote on them. He said he would like to comment on the County <br />Planning Commission's proposed work schedule. He said the subcommittee that has been working on <br />the master plan might want to make an inquiry of the Mayor as to the hiring of the City Planner and the <br />time schedule he has in mind. They can ask when the planner might be available to consult with the <br />commission. Mr. Durbin indicated the matter has now been turned over to Cheryl Farver, the Personnel <br />Director, and she is advertising for the position. Mr. O'Malley said it is up to the subcommittee to <br />follow up on some of the recommendations that the county commission made as far as plotting a course. <br />Mr. Spalding moved on to the ordinances and said he would suggest a correction to the first page. He <br />believes some re-wording is necessary to the "whereas" section at the bottom of the page. He said the <br />balance of it is fine. Mr. O'Malley pointed out the amended version was based upon some review by Mr. <br />Conway and some suggestions made by Council committee. He reviewed the differences between the <br />9