Laserfiche WebLink
capability of the power platforms. He asked for the furthest distance they have ever put one from a pole. <br />He said he wonders if they can go safely under the bleachers and be protected by the chain link fence and <br />then just have the pole. Mr. Richards said they have to remain quite close to the pole itself. As you <br />increase the length of the cable run, it degrades the signal so they try to keep the equipment as close as <br />possible to the antennas, hence it being directly at the base of the monopole. He said in reviewing different <br />sites with members of the school administration, this is where it was decided to be the least intrusive and <br />the most out of the way. It also borders the earthen mound previously discussed so it buffers the base of <br />the site from the properties to the west. Mr. Koeth pointed out the earth mound is not landscaping. Mr. <br />Richards said it is 8-10 feet tall so the homes to the west would not be able to see the base station <br />equipment or the compound. Mr. Koeth said they cannot expect that mound to be there forever. Mr. <br />Richards said his point is that placing it behind the stadium would certainly put it in a more visible area <br />and not meet the 300 foot setback. Mr. Yager asked if he is saying there is already a pole or a previous <br />consideration was closer to the middle school. Mr. Richards said there are 4 light poles on each side of <br />the field. They are about 55-60 feet tall. He confirmed there is no other carrier pole on the site. He said in <br />order to keep the lighting of the field symmetrical they have placed it as close as possible to the existing <br />light pole. They off set it by a few feet from the existing light pole but the further away you get, they don't <br />meet the setback and the lighting of the field becomes less symmetrical. Mr. Koeth asked for <br />confirmation on the height of the tower. Mr. Richards said it would be 120 feet to the top of the structure <br />and there is a 9 foot lightning rod at the top. Mr. Koeth asked about lightning storms and attracting <br />lightning so close to the stadium. Mr. Yager said it would have a grounding rod and it would be better <br />than hitting the bleachers. Mr. Richards said that Amy Habinski from Sprintcom will address the <br />grounding issue. Ms. Habinski said they have a construction manager for the site who was unable to <br />attend the meeting. She said every site is extensively grounded. It is actually an advantage. The fence is <br />also grounded. Mr. Koeth said his concern is the landscaping and the space by the fence. Mr. Yager said <br />the landscaping will end up being crushed. They are better off putting it inside the fence. He would really <br />like the tower to go closer to the shed. Mr. Richards said in looking at the drawing that would make it <br />within 50-70 feet from the eastern property line. The location now is as close as they can get to being in <br />the center of the field without actually getting onto the track or field. Mr. Koeth asked about the other end <br />of the school property down by I-480 and the soccer practice field. Mr. Richards said that access <br />becomes an issue down there and the intent of the site is to cover as much of the neighborhoods to the <br />north for coverage. He said that going further south degrades the coverage to the north that they want to <br />achieve. Mr. Yager said if they move it down, if the center point moved closer to I-480, it would not <br />really have an impact. They would still be within the suburban level they need. The cell tower would be <br />closest to the highway level, which they also need. They would still be on school property. Mr. Richards <br />said he will have Mr. Steve Fannin, the RF engineer from Sprint, address that issue. He said this site was <br />the one they could do the furthest north to shift that coverage north and reach the neighborhoods they <br />wanted to cover. Initially, they were trying to find something further north so going south toward I-480 <br />does affect the neighborhood coverage they need. Mr. Fannin, the radio frequency engineer, came <br />forward to address the commission. He asked for clarification on where the soccer field is located. Mr. <br />Koeth reviewed the site and pointed out there are a lot of trees there. Mr. Fannin said that as Mr. <br />Richards mentioned, the proposed location is more centrally located to the coverage hole and he would <br />have to evaluate the alternative location mentioned. Mr. Koeth said it is about a 1/4-mile from the <br />proposed location. He told them to take a look at it and see if it is a possibility. They may still want to get <br />a pole to the north, perhaps farther up in Westlake. They would like to see a couple of options. He then <br />asked if there were any representatives present from the school. Mr. Rob Matson, the School Board <br />Treasurer, came forward. Mr. Matson said there are two reasons they went with the proposed location. <br />The first is that Sprint indicated it would be an ideal location and secondly, they felt it would also be out of <br />the way and less intrusive. Mr. Koeth said he would like to have Mr. Hyland from the school district <br />come to the next meeting to get his thoughts on the subject. Mr. Yager asked Mr. O'Malley if the board <br />has much of a say as to where the tower goes. Mr. O'Malley said the board has some leeway. There are a <br />number of legal issues. He said within the site they can work with the applicant and the landowner to find <br />3