Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. O'Malley indicated that the City has done everything to help the applicant through the <br />process. He reiterated that the Architectural Review Board should not send forward anything <br />that was not in an approvable form. He said that the applicant has had a long period of time to <br />work with the City, and that it is not up to the City to rush the project through the approval <br />process. He asked the applicant to review the changes and repeat back to the Board what was <br />asked of them. He further said that they have a huge burden with the number of variances <br />being requested. <br />Mr. Crook moved to table this proposal until the January 2005 meeting with the <br />recommendations that they make the modifications as cliscussed: <br />1) The pilaster and cornice element in the south elevation will be elirninated. <br />2) Wandows are modified on the 2"d story to reflect a more commerciaUresidential look. <br />3) Main arch feature on Lorain and Porter will be revised to reflect vertical pilasters on <br />each side of the central arch with a raised cornice. <br />4) On the left elevation, look at incorporating some more vertical brick on the first story <br />to break up the continuous windows. <br />5) East elevation - continue the first floor glass and second floor residential look to <br />balance the east elevataon with the south elevation. <br />6) East elevation - elirninating the 8 x 8 block below the windows, brick and landscaping <br />will be put in lieu of that. Glass will be continuing where the door is so that it is not a <br />separate element. <br />7) Continue diamond pattern ancl light fixture elements to match the existing building. <br />8) Add landscaping comments that were presented by Brian Zergott. <br />9) Add additional landscaping by the service drop off area. <br />In addition, along the north side Porter Road residences, fencing will be continued to the <br />building, extend the planter west to the building. Add arboi°vitaes to the planter. Add <br />versalock in lieu of river walk wall at the main corner. J. Nader seconded, the motion, <br />which was unanimously approved. <br />VI. AI)JOURNMENT: <br />Acting Chairman Crook adjourned the meeting at 6:55 p.an. <br /> <br />John C' •ook, Acting Chairman Date: <br />Lois McNabb, <br />c ?A-