|
Bosworth and the building department files that includes additional photographs and
<br />their inspection reports. .
<br />M. Conway moved that the Board find as a matter of fact that the building/
<br />house located at 4170 Columbia Road in the City of North Olmsted is a
<br />dangerous building and constitutes a public nuisance pursuant to Sections
<br />1331.01 and 1331.03. These findings: of fact are based upori the testimony of
<br />building commissioner, D. Conway, as well as the photographs and inspection
<br />reports of the building department, which are hereby incorporated. Further,
<br />that the Board based its findings upon and incorporates the expert report of
<br />Jeffrey A. Grussenmeyer dated October 26, 2004 and Kris Bosworth dated
<br />October 25, 2004. That the Board finds that the building must be demolished
<br />pursuant to Section 1331.01. That the Board also finds the Building
<br />Commissioner's Order to demolish dated May.17, 2004 was warranted and is
<br />hereby confirmed. P. Engoglia seconded the motion, roll call on the motion; N.
<br />Althen, abstained, M. Conway, R. Puzzitiello and P. Engoglia ".yes". Motion
<br />passed.
<br />Mr. Conway directed the Clerlc to draft the demolition order, on behalf of the Board,
<br />and serve it upon all interested parties, in accordance with the procedure of Chapter
<br />1331. Mr. O'Malley advised the Board that the building department has completed
<br />title searches and has served several orders and can identify the lien holders and other
<br />parties of interest. Mr. O'Malley said. he would be ?at the disposal of the clerk to
<br />assist in the drafting of the order and causing it to be served. ;
<br />M. Conway moved to direct the Clerk to draft on behalf of the Board, a written
<br />memorandum to City Council, with copies to the Mayor and the Law Director,
<br />Finance, Safety and Public Service, requesting that Council cause the dangerous
<br />building at 4170 Columbia to be demolished pursuant to Section 1331.05 (e). P.
<br />Engoglia seconded the motion, roll,call?on the u}otion; N. Althen, abstained, M.
<br />Conway, R. Puzzitiello and P. ?Engoglia `,`yes". Motion, passed., ,
<br />New Business
<br />Heidi Reddinger, 4535 Porter Road; WORD 1 Proposal consists of replacing`a pasture fence with a new chain link fence.
<br />The following variances are requested:
<br />1) 4" x 4' wood posts for a chain link fence, which is in violation of Rod.
<br />(1369.05 (A4)). ?? ,
<br />,... ..i- ,:.,??(, ?;: ; i -rr.1 - 'I I,: I i .
<br />2) No top rail on a chain link fence, wfiicli is, in violation of Ord. ,
<br />(1369.05 (A3)).
<br />3) Posts installed are facing neighbor's propertywhich is in violatiori of
<br />?, . Ord. (1369.03 (A1)).
<br />. , ,.. ,
<br />The applicant came forward and is requesting to install a chain link fence in order to
<br />lceep miniature horses, goats and llamas in the.yard. , Currently, they have wood 4 x 4
<br />posts with a chain link fenFe. The fen?,e is {n, ?iled; onthe insi„de of tl?e 4 xI 4, posts. This
<br />, , ? ,
|