My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/07/2004 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
2004
>
2004 Board of Zoning Appeals
>
10/07/2004 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:49:41 PM
Creation date
1/28/2019 8:46:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
2004
Board Name
Board of Zoning Appeals
Document Name
Minutes
Date
10/7/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CITY OF NORTH OLMSTEID <br />BOARD OF ZONIle1G APPEALS <br />OCTOBER 7, 2004 <br />MIl`1iJTES <br />I. 1tOLL CAI.,L: <br />Chairman Maloney called the meeting to order at 730 p.m. <br />PRESENT: Chaurnan J. Maloney, Board members; W. Kremzar and M. Diver. <br />ALSO PRESEN'T: Assistant Law Director B. O'Malley, Planning Director K. Wenger, Building <br />Commissioner D. Conway and Clerk of Commissions D. Rote. <br />ABSENT: Board members N. Sergi and T. Kelley. <br />Chairman Maloney reviewed that there were 6 cases requesting 11 variances and 2 special <br />permits on the docket. He further advised that the board members had viewed the premises <br />involved for each case. Three votes are required for approval. In addition, each case will be <br />judged on the physical situation peculiar to itself, so that in no way is a judgment rendered <br />considered to be a general policy judgment affecting properties and like situations <br />elsewhere. <br />H. REVIEVV AND CORRECTION OF MIlNCTTES: <br />The Board of Zoning Appeals minutes dated September 9, 2004 have been submitted for approval. <br />W. Kremzar moved to approve the September 9, 2004, Board of Zoning Appeals minutes as <br />written. J.1VYaloney seeonded the motion, which was unanimously approved. <br />Chairman Maloney advised the audience that the order of the docket would be changed and the <br />board would address Corner Stone Plaza first. <br />III. SUII.DING DEPARTMENT REQUESTSs <br />Corner Stone Plaza. 23420 Lorain Road, WRD 2: <br />Request for variance (1123.12). The proposal consists of renovations and addition to existing <br />building. <br />The following variances are requested: <br />A special permit for alterations and adding to a non-conforming structure, as the existing building <br />does not meet the current requirements for the 75-ft. front setback, section (1165.02 (b) (1)). <br />1. A 16 foot variance for setback from right-of-way line to parking on corner lots, (code requires <br />minimum of 20', applicant shows 4'), this setback area is required to be landscaped, section <br />(1139.08 (a)). <br />2. A 10 foot side yard setback for west property line, (code requires 10', applicant shows 0'), this <br />area is also required to be landscaped, section (1139.07). <br />3. A variance for 3 luminaries at north property line, (code requires full cut-off, applicant shows <br />none), section (1161.12 (d)), (see note 1). <br />4. A variance for luminary mounting height at north property line, (code does not permit, applicant <br />shows 3 at 14' 6"), section (1161.12 (e)). <br />Note: Although luminaries are not full cut off as defined in the zoning code, house shields are to be <br />installed so no light shines to the north. <br />Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 sections (1165.02 (b) (1)), (1139.08 (a)), (1139.07), (1161.12 <br />(d)) and (1161.12 (e)). <br />Chairman Maloney called all interested parties forward to review the request. Mr. Montgomery with <br />corner stone plaza came forward to be sworn in and address the proposal. They would like to reface <br />and add to the existing building and have met a few times with the city to achieve a plaza that will <br />best suite the cities needs as well as their own. The board asked how fire equipment and delivery <br />trucks were going to maneuver the site. The applicant felt that delivery trucks could maneuver the
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.