07/07/2004 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 sections (1123.12) and (1135.06 A). Note: Existing residence has only a 5' front setback due to irregular lot line. Building permit can not be issued until pending driveway is constructed. Chairman Maloney called all interested parties forward to review the request. Mr. & Mrs. Fiorilli the owners and son Bryan Fourilli each came forward to be sworn in and review the request. The applicant reviewed that after purchasing the home they found out that the home was a non-conforming home as the unusual shape of the lot places the home 5-feet from the property line. It was suggested that O.D.O.T. owns a portion of the front lot which creates the unusual lot shape. The board questioned if the Sterns Road extension affected the applicants property. The applicant believed that the expansion would not affect his parcel. The applicant reviewed that a section of the home would be removed, replaced and a second floor would be added. They will also replace the existing dilapidated deck with a new wrap around deck. The Assistant Building Commissioner requested that if the board granted the variances he would like the following conditions placed on the approval; 1). A temporary gravel driveway be allowed during construction of the addition. However, prior to the issuance of the occupancy permit a hard surface driveway must be installed. 2). Once the occupancy permit is obtained a garage is to be constructed within one year of the occupancy permit date. The applicants agreed to the Building Departments requests. Mr. Rymarczyk advised the applicant that they would have to seek the approval of the Engineering department regarding the apron installation requirements. J. Maloney moved to grant Raymond Fiorilli of 6236 Stearns lZoad his request for variance (1123.12), which consists of an acfdition to an existing residence and that the following variances are granted as aanended; A special permit to add to a non- conforming building, (1165.02). 1). A 50 foot variance for a residence too close to the front property line, (code requires 50 ft. applicant slnows 0'), section (1135.06 A). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 sections (1123.12) and (1135.06 A). 'I'he granting of the variances includes a teanporary gravel driveway during the construction of the addition being allowed. The hard surface driveway is to be installed prior to receiving an occupancy permit pending weatteer conditions. Within one (1) year from the issuance of the occupancy permit a garage is to be erected. The curb cut/apron will be subject to the Engineering Departments requirements. W. Kremzar seconded the motion which was unanianously approved. Variances Granted as amended. 3. James Carlin; 3955 Lvdgate Drave: (WRD 1) Request for variance (1123.12). Proposal consists of erecting a shed. The following variance is requested: 1. A 2 foot 6 inch variance for a shed too close to rear property line, (code requires 10', applicant shows 7.5'). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section (1135.02 (D 4)). Note: Landscaping for play area restricts placement of shed. Chairman Maloney called all interested parties forward to review the request. Mr. & Mrs. Carlin the owners each came forward to be sworn in and review the request. The applicant indicated that as they are a corner lot they would place the 10' x 10' shed on the back of their lot by the existing playground equipment. However they will only be 6'/z feet from the rear yard line. The board reviewed a memo from the Engineering department voicing that the swell must be maintained for proper drainage. Mr. Rymarczyk questioned if the applicant meant 7'/2 feet. The applicant indicated that his application form was wrong the 3