3/7/2005 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting March 7, 2005 replied that, though it’s been a few years, he guessed the number at ten or twelve. Mr. Sebring suggested as well that, in the past, Walmart previously helped with the Park by way of an environmental grant and that this might be another avenue to explore. Rec Center Improvements Mr. Kelley said that, at the last meeting of the Parks and Recreation Commission, the Commission was looking at an improvement of the Rec Center itself. An outlay of approximately $7 million was suggested for improvements. The Commission thought that, since the School Board was reviewing the possibility of athletic facilities and a middle school, it would be better to table legislation and talk to the School Board by asking its members to come to one of our meetings. Perhaps the Rec Cener and the School Board could get on the same page for the same things. The High School Hockey Team plays here at the Rec Center. The Swim Team is here at the Rec Center. The Baseball Team plays at the Community Park. If the City is going to update facilities for the schools, Mr. Kelley’s opinion was that, possibly, one proposal could take care of everything. Ge asked the members of the School Board what their plans were, remembering that both the Rec Center and the School Board must go back to the voters. If there are two entities vying for something in the middle in this community there will be two losers unless both combine mutual interests. At this point, Mr. Kelley opened the floor for discussion. Mr. Lasko noted that he sees a variety of different improvements that are proposed for the immediate years but did not see a list of long-term goals or objectives beyond that having a dollar amount with it. However, it will be difficult to understand or determine what The Rec Center and the School Board are coordinating until there is something that is going to be a little more tangible along the lines as what the schools have proposed. For example, indicate the items that the Rec needs done, and their proposed cost. Mr. Lasko’s concern was that, if long-range planning is being considered, and Ms. Wenger is the expert when it comes to planning, it seems to Mr. Lasko that there must be a more detailed list of needs and how and what the needs are. There is willingness on the part of the schools and the City to coordinate efforts so that the taxpayers get the best value. However, there must be a great deal of specificity as to what are the priorities from the city’s side and what are the potential costs of those priorities. That part has already been done on the schools’ side. Mr. Kelley said that, when the proposal was taken last Rec Commission meeting with the recommendations of the addition to the Rec Center, those plans were ten years old. Mr. DiSalvo said that, at last month, this matter was a proposal option: what needs to be done in the future. The Rec Center building is 30 years old, and Mr. DiSalvo said that specific lingering isues need to be addressed. The question is whether the School Board and the City can come together. There are mutual facilities that both the schools and the Rec needs to maintain, so the purpose of this meeting is to see if we can finally put a proposal together. Mr. DiSalvo said that he could not give any current specifics because, hopefully, the proposal will be completed together. If not, the Rec Center will carry on and an alternative option will be formulated. It all Page 2