5/2/2005 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Minutes of a Meeting of The Parks and Recreation Commission May 2, 2005 administration, but perhaps the prudent course of action would be to say that we table anything with the development of athletic facilities until there is a collaborative effort between the city and the schools seen. Ms. Wenger, in her remarks, has indicated that this not be an open-ended type of commitment; there will be a timeline that will be developed as part of this process, but the ball has to get rolling sooner or later and, hopefully, sooner. Ms. Wenger said that she thought the schools have done a good job in putting forth a proposal in indicating what their needs are, and the city needs to do the same, since it has needs of its own which need to be addressed explicitly in a plan. There will be some areas where cooperation makes sense and other ways where it won’t. Recreation must be looked at as a whole instead of isolating certain elements. As the schools move along with their campaign and when we understand the vote in November, then we can see the public’s commitment to support certain things and we can work towards cooperation. Mr. Lasko said this was just brainstorming now. He could see that a proposal to a community would be: we would like to see your opinion about the conversion of Pine from an intermediate school into a new Middle School which would, in fact, then, encompass athletics at its own level. As a result, the campus at Pine would have the attendant development of a football field and some baseball fields, etc. It would only make sense to develop that at the same time as the Middle School is being developed in order to meet the athletic needs of the Middle School people and then see how well it fits in with the overall recreational plan of the City of North Olmsted. The proposal on the table right now in conceptual form about the construction of an athletic field behind the existing Middle School could be held in abeyance pending the outcome of a look at recreational facilities as a whole. Mr. Jesse said that within the next two or three years there will be major issues connected to the pool: repair issues or complete renovation. In anything Mr. Jesse saw from the schools, there isn’t anything in their proposal for a new hockey rink or pool. If the schools intend on continuing the hockey program or swim program, then part of that issue in the Fall should have some money in it that comes from the schools towards the renovations of those two recreational facilities. That amount could be easily calculated. That should be part of the bond issue, set aside and spoken for and, if the repair is necessary, the monies will be available. There have been preliminary discussions with the superintendent to that effect and, in principle, that was part of the process as far as wanting to continue with the programs and using the Rec facilities to do so. The schools did not have any plans in putting together the pool or hockey rink. This should be a definite component to the levy. There should be a recommendation from the Rec Commission very soon to say that in consideration of the whole tax issue in North Olmsted, anything the schools want to do with recreation must come from the schools. Mr. Kelley said that Mr. Jesse’s thoughts aligned with his thinking. Mr. Jesse said that the fact remains that there have been seven school levies turned down in the past fifteen years, and there Page 7