My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8/7/2006 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
2006
>
2006 Recreation Commission
>
8/7/2006 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/13/2019 3:09:06 PM
Creation date
1/23/2019 8:09:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
2006
Board Name
Recreation Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
8/7/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Minutes of a Meeting of the <br />North Olmsted Parks and Recreation Commission <br />August 7, 2006 <br />Page Five <br /> <br /> <br />Financials <br /> <br />Revenue <br /> <br />Mr. DiSalvo said that page one indicated revenues, but the bottom line is that at the end of July the <br />Recreation Department has generated 73.7% of revenue. Mr. Baxter said at the last meeting that the <br />Enrichment Programs were doing very well; he noticed this month that $80,000 was taken from <br />Enrichment and moved into Administration. Ms. Drenski said that Enrichment is at 133% of what was <br />projected. Jenny Couts has already exceeded her budget right now. Mr. Baxter apologized; asking if <br />he was looking at the wrong line. Mr. Baxter said that he was looking at the third item – original <br />estimate $154,000; revised estimate $74,000? Maybe he was reading it wrong. Mr. DiSalvo said that <br />the original estimated revenue means nothing. Mr. Baxter thought that the original plan was somehow <br />revised down. Mr. DiSalvo said he did not know why the first column was there; the actual plan is the <br />second column, where it says “Revised Est Rev” – that is the Rec Department’s actual budget. <br /> <br />Ms. Drenski said that the original number was an old number and included Coke income, so originally <br />it wasn’t aligned correctly. $74,000 is what was estimated for that line. Mr. Baxter said that was fine; <br />it was explained well. <br /> <br />Mr. DiSalvo said that Jenny Couts is doing an excellent job with the summer camp program. Much of <br />the revenue for Enrichment came from summer camp. The Recreation Department hasn’t scratched <br />the surface with what’s planned in the autumn and winter for enrichment programs. Ms. Couts is at <br />$100,000 year-to-date. Mr. Dailey said that it was decided to make Jenny (Couts) a full-time <br />employee, and she has exceeded all expectations. <br /> <br />Mr. Barker asked if Concessions included the game machines. Mr. DiSalvo said, no, that would fall <br />under Administration. <br /> <br />Mr. Baxter asked what makes up the big number in Administration if the pool and ice rink is added <br />separately. Mr. DiSalvo said that under Administration is tax revenue being generated. Mr. Baxter <br />asked if it could be broken down a bit more on the next report for a better analysis. Mr. DiSalvo said <br />it would be done. <br /> <br />Mr. DiSalvo said that, at the end of July, being at 73.7% is very good. He knew that something had to <br />be done about the pool, despite the fact that it’s 52.4%. Currently, there’s an interim pool <br />coordinator, Jenna Crea, who is only able to work 20 hours a week as opposed to 40 plus. The Rec is <br />able to maintain its schedule but not able to advance and create more programming. By the last week <br /> <br />Minutes of a Meeting of the <br />Page 5 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.