My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/21/1996 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
1996
>
1996 Civil Service Commission
>
10/21/1996 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2019 8:49:06 AM
Creation date
2/13/2019 7:10:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
1996
Board Name
Civil Service Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
10/21/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
A <br />- CITY OF NORTH OLMSTED <br />CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION <br />5200 Dover Center Road • North Olmsted, Ohio 44070 <br />Phone: 777-8000 Ext. 232 <br />Fax: 777-5889 <br />CITY OF NORTH OLMSTED <br />CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION <br />AMENDED MINUTES OCTOBER 21, 1996 <br />I. ROLL CALL: <br />The regular meeting of the civil service commission of October; 21, 1996 will now <br />commence.... present areI ChairmanCu�runings, CommisZol <br />sioner at; .Commissioner Benjamin, <br />Police Chief Viola; Fire ChiefOsterhouse, Safety Director Kaslet and the following members from <br />our fire department. Mr%Lane, Mr. Gut, Mx. --Vance, Mr Gerber; W. -Tower, Mr. Robertson, Mr. <br />Ciarrone, Mr." Schantz,'Mh Prebis, .and Mr Hehnen <br />II. DISPOSITION =Any <br />corrections o the m nutes bf September 16, 1996. The minutes were approved <br />as writtef <br />t <br />III. REPORTS: <br />Mr Hines has"accepted a job offer in -Columbus and has�resgned from the Civil Service <br />Commission effective October 1, ;1996." Congratulations „Jim, we will miss you. Mr. Ernest <br />Cumniiigs has beenFappointed asahe thvrd civil service commissioner.. The commission <br />decided that Mr. Cnmmirigs will be chairman and Mrs Zolar co-chairman <br />IV. OLD BUSINESS <br />1) Promotional Fire Lieutenant Examination <br />The written examination was given on Apiii !4, 1996 On May 11, the op six candidates were <br />permitted to take the oral assessment. At theyJuue 17th :n tin%' there was a protest filed by <br />Mr. Ronald Prehis He felt his seniority points should have been added iri after the written <br />examination. Due to; the fact the rule was vague, the commission agreed to re -administer the <br />oral assessment portion of the test to Mr. Prebis plus those candidates he could surpass. It was <br />decided, when `thereis a need'to,hire beyond the..can&date. ranked'second, the oral examination <br />would have to be r&,admniistered to candidates} ranked third through sixth plus Mr. Prebis. <br />The candidates ranked third through sixth are, opposed to this decision. All the candidates <br />affected by this decision seem`to have come up -With a solution that will be beneficial to <br />everyone. Mr. Prebis, the spokesman for the group at our previous meeting, is willing to drop <br />5 of his extra credit points if only he will be required to take the oral assessment. The <br />commission preferred to administer this examination at a location where one is already being <br />given. The question as to whether we can extend the list to two years from the date Mr. Prebis <br />will take the examination, was referred to the law director for his opinion. The commission <br />has received a copy of the law director's written opinion in their packets. The secretary read <br />the law director's written opinion and a copy was sent around the room. Mr. Hehnen <br />requested to go on record that he filed an individual protest. A copy of this protest along with <br />several others are on file in the civil service office. Mr. Hehnen explained that the law <br />directors opinion adversely effects him, as he will be required to recompete against candidates <br />ranked third, fifth, and sixth plus Mr. Prebis. He believed this is unfair because he is not given <br />the opportunity to compete against candidates ranked first and second. Mr. Hehnen believed <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.