My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06/18/2001 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
2001
>
2001 Civil Service Commission
>
06/18/2001 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2019 8:53:34 AM
Creation date
2/13/2019 8:08:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
2001
Board Name
Civil Service Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
6/18/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Webvision: Color Perception <br />Page 9 of 18 <br />.4 <br />1964). <br />3. Identification of the genetic code for L, M and S cones (Nathans et al, 1986a,b). <br />4. Colour matching functions. <br />5. Isolating photoreceptors and measuring their physiological repsonses as a function of wavelength <br />(Baylor et al, 1984). <br />6. Spectral sensitivity measurements (Wald -Marne spectral sensitivity functions and Stiles' 7c - <br />mechanisms) <br />However, the trichomatic theory fails to account for the four unique colours: red,. green, yellow and blue, <br />and also fails to explain why dichromats can perceive white and yellow. It also fails to fully explain <br />colour discrimination functions and opponent colour percepts. <br />The opponent colour .theory was first proposed by Hering in 1872. At the time, this theory rivalled the <br />well accepted trichromatic theory which explains the trichromasy of vision and predicts colour matches. <br />Hering s opponent colour theory suggests that there are three channels: red -green, blue -yellow and <br />black -white, with each responding in an antagonist way. That is, either red .or green is perceived and <br />never greenish -red. Hering, however, never'challenged the initial stages of processing expressed by the <br />trichromatic theory. He simply argued that any colour vision theory should explain our perception, that <br />is, colour opponency as revealed by coloured after images. <br />Hurvich and Jameson (1957) provided quantitative data for colour opponency. Using hue cancellation <br />paradigms, the psychophysical colour opponent channels were isolated. The VX function was used to <br />brightness discrimination to describe the perception of blackness and whiteness. Therefore, by adjusting <br />the amount of blue or yellow AND red or green, any sample wavelength can be matched (figure 15). <br />Complementary wavelengths can be used to cancel each other for all wavelengths except the four unique <br />hues (blue, green, yellow and red). <br />Fiunrel5. Hurvich and _Jam eson c%lieriment using blue or v w AND red or green io mich alawavcleneths of the � isiirle srrectrum (Hurykh and 7ameson's data <br />!]X157) from Bcniamin, .T. (Ed). P.,orislr's Clinical Refraction. Philadel )Ha: W. B. Saunders Comnant; 199fi)_L� rr snaue1 <br />Other evidence supporting the opponent colour theory include: <br />1. Electrical recordings of horizontal cells from fish retina show blue -yellow opponent process and <br />red -green opponent (Svaetichin, 1956). <br />2. Electrical recording from the lateral geniculate nucleus showing opponent colour processes <br />http://www.webvision.med.utah.edu/]KallColor.html 6/1-8/01 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.