My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/13/2007 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
2007
>
2007 Civil Service Commission
>
11/13/2007 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2019 8:57:29 AM
Creation date
2/12/2019 4:13:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
2007
Board Name
Civil Service Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
11/13/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
I. <br />II. <br />IV. <br />CITY OF NORTH OLMSTED <br />CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION MEETING <br />CITY COUNCIL CAUCUS ROOM <br />MINUTES - NOVEMBER 13, 2007 <br />8:00 P.M. <br />ROLL CALL: Chairman M. Ubaldi called the meeting to order at 8:02 PM <br />PRESENT: M. Ubaldi, W. Hohmann, and K. Zolar <br />ALSO PRESENT: Court Reporter Caryn Lott, Sandie Agresta, Lori Borowski, Mary Ramirez, <br />WWTP Superintendent Sharon Schlemmer, Thomas Herbster, Human Resource Director C. Farver, <br />Service Director Duane Limpert, Assistant Law Director B. O'Malley, Civil Service Secretary <br />Donna Eccleston <br />DISPOSITION OF MINUTES: <br />COMMUNICATIONS: <br />OLD BUSINESS: <br />V. NEW BUSINESS: <br />The Commission conducted two (2) hearings. Rule XIII of the Civil Service Rules and Regulations <br />explains the hearing procedure. The appointing authority presents evidence first; the employee has <br />an opportunity to present evidence to refute; the employer would have an opportunity in rebuttal. <br />The Commission functions as a quasi-judicial capacity almost as if the Commissioners are a three <br />(3) judge panel. The Commission's decision must be based on the evidence provided after a <br />thorough review. Everyone expects to have a full opportunity to be heard by an unbiased panel. At <br />the conclusion of the hearings, any decision that the Commissioners' make would be issued in <br />writing together with findings in support of the determination. The appointing authority that <br />received notice of the appeal would proceed first. The employee would have an opportunity to <br />question any witnesses that are brought forward. The third step would be to have the employer or <br />appointing authority rebutting whatever case they may have. It is important for the people that <br />testify that one person is speaking at a time; any comments or an opportunity to be heard should <br />first address the chair and that the chair would control the commentary as it comes in. Reference to <br />documents and things of that nature is important to be clear about what rule is being referred to or <br />what correspondence is being referenced. The court reporter can accept any documents that anyone <br />wants to present, mark them and keep them as part of the record. When a person is behind the <br />podium, they need to identify themselves, address the court reporter and the court reporter will <br />administer the oath. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.