Laserfiche WebLink
BUILDING & ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br />CITY OF NORTH OLMSTED <br />MINUTES FOR APRIL 5, 2021 <br />ROLL CALL <br />Chairman Allain called the meeting to order at 7:02 pm via online public meeting. <br />Present: Eric Allain, Bob Papotto, Suzie Patton, Ralph Mackey, Dan Rahm <br />Staff. Planning Director Kim Lieber, Law Director Michael Gareau, Jr., Administrative Assistant <br />Nicole Rambo -Ackerman <br />REVIEW AND CORRECTION OF MINUTES <br />Mr. Papotto moved, seconded by Ms. Patton, to approve the Building & Zoning Board of <br />Appeals minutes of March 1, 2021, motion passed 5-0. <br />RESIDENTIAL APPEALS AND REQUESTS <br />21-18610; William Roberts; 27855 Blossom Boulevard <br />Representative: Bill Roberts, owner <br />Proposal consists of a new fence. Property is zoned A -One Family Residence. <br />1. A 3 ft. 6 in. variance for height of a fence in the front yard; code allows a fence in the front <br />yard not to exceed 30 in., applicant shows 6 ft., Section 1135(D)(2). <br />2. A 50% variance for an opaque fence in the front yard; code allows a fence in the front yard <br />not to exceed 50% opacity, applicant shows 100%, Section 1135.02(D)(2). <br />Note: The fence installed along the side property line is a 6 ft. high cedar fence. The portion that <br />extends beyond the house is located in the front yard. <br />The applicant installed a six-foot cedar fence along the west property line that encroaches into <br />the front yard. The permit application submitted by the contractor inaccurately showed the layout <br />of the house, with the garage located on the wrong side of the lot, and the permit was granted <br />based upon this information. Upon inspection, the error came to light. Fences in front yards <br />cannot exceed 30 inches in height or be over 50% opaque. Two variances are required for height <br />and opacity of that portion of the fence that was installed between the street line and the closest <br />point of the dwelling along the west property line, which is the house, not the projecting garage. <br />Mr. Roberts wanted the fence to provide privacy from his neighbor. He submitted the county <br />aerial view which shows the open area between his property and his neighbor. He has <br />experienced issues with the neighbor and tried speaking with the neighbor multiple times but the <br />issues have not been resolved. He did not realize the paperwork submitted was incorrect until the <br />inspector brought it up. There have been some close calls with the children next door when <br />backing out of his driveway, so the fence will improve safety. During a neighbor's gathering, a <br />vehicle crossed the property line and used the applicant's driveway to leave the property. He <br />added that another house on the street has a fence in a similar location. <br />