2/7/2022 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

explained that there is a section regarding chain Zink fencing requirements in the Building Code that may not be able to be met. Mr. Gareau did not think adding chain link fencing to the posts %would be aestheticalh appealing. Mr. Allain did not think the fence tope %Nag excluded Irom the permitted fence types because of safetN concerns hecause chain link lcrwCS Nwuld not be permitted either. Ile was in Iaworofmaking the variance conditional upon moving the mesh to the other side. Ms. Patton thought adding the location. height and of the fence to the motion %Mould be favorable. Mr. Rahn did not think the split rail fence would keep dogs contained but would he in furor of adding the conditions. Mr. Mackcv added that the concerns about the space between the split rail lencing and wire mesh but he thought that could be remedied by trimming and attaching the mesh directly to the split rail fence. I IC thought additional coordination bchween the neighbors may be needed to prevent the dogs flour jumping over the fence. Mr. Allain did not %rant stainless steel staples to he required in case other fastener tapes could be used. Mr. Papotto moved, seconded by Mr. Mackey, to approve the variance for 22-21132; .lames Laing; 27882 Sanders Lane to add la-gauge wire to a post and rail fence according to Section 1369.112, conditioned upon the following: 1. The wire mesh is to be moved to the side of the split rail fence facing 27882 Sanders Lane; 2. The "ire mesh shall not extend above the top of the horizontal rail; 3. The wire mesh shall be secured with nun-corrosive fasteners spaced no less than 6 inches apart so there are no gaps between the wire mesh and split rail fencing. )'lotion passed 5-0. 22-21156; Robert Dchoff; 25171 Doc Drive Representatives: Robert Dcholf. owner: Michael ESSa N. 1536 Buckhurst Run. UA ads%North. OI I proposal consists of a generator. Property is zoned C-One I amih Residence. I. A ? Il. variance for side card setback: code requires that generators project no less than 5 It. from any side lot line, applicant sho%%s 3 It. Section 1 13,.07 IC) Mr. I ssarr is the electrical manager I-or Blind and Sons. N% ho installed the generator. I le explained that the venerator manufacturer. Gcnerac Generators. requires that the generator he installed at no Tess than fn-c feet from a building opening, which eliminates its installation in the rear of the applicant s home. The generator eras installed on the cast side of the hone and the neighbor has a large, solid fence that provides sonic screening. the applicant will also screen the generator from the street view b% installing a similar solid knee gate in the spring. They measured the decibels from the neighbors house when the panel %%as laid next to the generator and it was 61 decibels. the neighbor also has a generator which %Nould generate a similar level of noise. Mr. Dehoff presented photos of the gate he would like to install and the decibel reading Ic%'el from the nearest point of the neighbors home. Ms. Seeley said the permit paperwork %Mas mailed to the Building Department on November I 1 and the generator was installed on the 18°i prior to the permit being issued. the applicants %%ill need to request a noise variance front the Sal'et% department if the setback wariancc is approved. Mr. Allain asked %%hy a permit was not pulled before the generator Nvm installed. Mr. GssarN X% Lis under the impression that the permit w;u pulled alrcadN and they have since changed their