5/10/2023 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mr. O'Malley used the example of bars and that there were spatial limitations dictated by the state, leading to situation like a bar being near a church. with the state having the authority over local zoning rules. Mr. Patton asked an additional question regarding the location of a business towards the border of the city, and questioned why that would be restricted. Director Upton stated that it would be the proximity of the business and schools. churches, parks. daycares, etc. Director Upton was asked to speak about the other two ordinances. He shared that 1139.03 outlined the schedule of uses for different zoning districts. The focus was to be on allowing certain establishments conditionally in B-1 and B-2 which are on the outskirts of town, away from the central business districts and schools. He invited the board members to consider whether they agreed with this conditional use or prefer these establishments to be closer to the central business district. Mr. O'Malley acknowledged the importance of discussing zoning regulations, and emphasized the Planning Commission's authoritative role. He went on and highlighted that City Council would need a supermajority to disregard the Commission's recommendation. Mr. O'Malley advised that the debate revolved around finding a suitable location for a 30,000 square foot shopping center in B -I or B-2 zones and considered whether such an intensive use is more appropriate for the central business district. He added that the Director's input involved the anticipation of future developments like schools, hookah bars. churches and daycares to address spatial limitation and potential legal challenges. Mr. O'Malley also noted that zoning authority is presumed constitutional unless proven otherwise, and a rational basis for legislation is generally sufficient without requiring a compelling state interest. Mr. Olivos asked if there was someone who wanted to develop a 30.000 square foot facility and there was a request to open an establishment listed in the code sections provided that they would still have an opportunity for a conditional use permit. Director Upton replied in agreement and added that an applicant can seek relief from the code by appealing to the Building and Zoning Board of Appeals. Mr. Olivos made a motion to recommend to Council the approval of Ordinance No. 2023-52: seconded by Mr. Leon. Motion Passed 4-0 Mr. Olivos made a motion to recommend to Council the approval of Ordinance No. 2023-53; seconded by Mr. Leon. Motion Passed 4-0 Mr. Olivos made a motion to recommend to Council the approval of Ordinance No. 2023-54: seconded by Mr. Leon. Motion Passed 4-0 COMMUNICATIONS Director Upton shared with the board the permanent volunteer for the commission and the need to nominated a chair and vice chair going forward. Director Upton also invited the board members to the Lorain Road Corridor Study Open House the following day. ADJOURNMENT With no further business before the board the meeting adjourned at 7:45 p.m.