5/6/2024 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

could be extended for easier access. The lighting poles, some within 20 feet of property lines. would have dimming features controlled by a central system with photocells and timers. The architect highlighted that flipping the poles to the other side would direct light towards properties, making it harder to control. There was a discussion focused on the height variance needed for the two-story builidng section and cupolas, with the most extreme point being 55 feet. The variance covers the entire front section and the kindergarten area. The city's attorney confirmed that the variance should be considered as one for the maximum height. The site faced challenges, including topsoil removal and stormwater constraints, necessitating extensive drainage solutions and careful traffic management to prevent road backups. The architect discussed varainces needed due to a buried stream on site. This created constraints, leading to setbacks exceeding code limits. They explained that drives and sidewalks, constrained by stormwater and grade changes. couldn't be closer to the building. The need to accommodate traffic flow and safety requirements for playground access further restricted placement. Additionally, the city's traffic engineer required alignment with a signalized four-way intersection at Walter Road, adding to the design challenges. Mr. Kovach motioned to approve the first variance request. the driveway setbacks: seconded by Ms. Patton. Site issues typical for large projects were acknowledged, noting drainage challenges and efforts to meet OFCC requirements. Board members felt the hardships were proven and minimized appropriately without compromising traffic safety, given the site's constraints. Motion passed: 4-0 Mr. Kovach motioned to approve the second variance, the height varaince, with the condition that the height requests are relative to the cupolas; seconded by Ms. Patton. It was noted that the architects and school board presented a drawing showing the variance request for the cupola covering the building's entire footprint. Thye acknowledged that the building height would not change. Motion passed 4-0 Mr. Kovach motioned to approve the third variance; the site lighting setback. seconded by Ms. Patton. It was noted that an alternative to meet the required setback by placing the lights on the other side of the drive was considered but deemed unviable due to increased lighting toward houses. The consideration was appreciated and affirmed that the discussed lighting met public safety needs. Motion passed: 4-0