10/06/2025 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

i structure would measure 28 by 24 feet, and the property, at 1.5 acres, currently includes a 440- square-foot attached garage that would remain in use. Contractor John Cavillo spoke on behalf of Mr. Geiger, explaining that the 83-year-old homeowner,who lives alone in a slab-style home without a basement,wanted the detached garage as a personal workspace for restoring antiques and small projects.He described it as a long-held dream that would both enhance the property and improve its appearance. The Building Department had no objections or additional comments.Board members asked about the existing attached garage,which will remain unchanged, and the condition of the current driveway.Mr. Cavillo confirmed that the deteriorated concrete driveway would be fully replaced and extended to the new garage.All new work would be concrete. When questioned about the proposed size,Mr. Cavillo explained that while the garage could technically be smaller,the dimensions reflected Mr. Geiger's wishes for a comfortable workspace.He shared personal remarks about wanting to help the elderly homeowner fulfill his dream and maintain the property in good condition. Mr.Mackey made a motion to approve: 327-2025; Bob Geiger; 23658 Mastick Rd.; seconded by Ms. Galateanu. Motion passed: 4-0 328-2025; George Bowman Jr.; 23724 Mastick Rd. The board reviewed a request from George Bowman Jr. of 23724 Mastick Road for two variances related to constructing a new single-family home. The first requested a 15-foot variance to the minimum required lot width-65 feet proposed where 80 feet is required. The second requested a 0.05-foot variance for side yard setback-14.95 feet total where 15 feet is required,with one side at 5 feet and the other at 9.95 feet. Contractor Jim O'Donnell, speaking on behalf of the applicant, explained that the new home was being built for his daughter and her fiancé,both schoolteachers who plan to marry soon. The lot, created years earlier through a family split,had long been considered buildable by the previous owners but was found to be slightly too narrow under current code. The proposed 1,550-square- foot home would be modest in size and consistent with surrounding properties.He emphasized that the request sought only minimal relief—five inches on one side—and that nearby neighbors had no objections. The Building Depaituient noted that the lot had sufficient depth and area for residential use, and the small variances would improve an overgrown vacant parcel. Staff expressed no objections, noting the design would blend with neighboring homes. Board members confirmed that the side yard variance equated to just over half an inch difference and made lighthearted remarks about the applicant's precise measurements.No objections or further questions were raised. 4