Laserfiche WebLink
submitted.Ms. Hemann mentioned that that is not what the building department requires and Mr. <br /> O'Malley concurred that statement as true. <br /> Mr. Whitt then announced that the dimensions of the drawings were not his intention. Mr. <br /> O'Malley mentioned that the dimensions did not reflect the will of the applicant but that the <br /> applicant was willing to comply with the scale and context of the drawings. He then noted that <br /> the drawings were not submitted by the applicant as received by Ms. Hemann. Ms. Egan Reeves <br /> commented that since the intended plans were not present that the application should be tabled <br /> and Ms Schuler requested an approval of the plans contingent on the receipt of accurate <br /> drawings. Ms.Hemann asked for a C of A contingent on proper drawings. Mr O'Malley <br /> mentioned that the dimensions were not clear. Mr. Holowicki mentioned that the verbal <br /> dimensions would not be feasible. Ms. Egan Reeves asked to table until corrected drawings be <br /> presented. Mr. O'Malley proposed asking for consent to table the application. The applicant did <br /> not approve. Mr. Dubowski raised the issue that the tighter dimension would pose a challenge to <br /> construction. Mr.Neville recommended resubmitting as an enlarged shed dormer. Mr. Madden <br /> commented that the scale posed a challenge. Ms. Hemann stated that Mr. Holowicki's <br /> distribution of Gerber drawings was done in error. Mr. O'Malley stated that as an incorrect <br /> characterization. <br /> Mr.Neville replied that he would be seeking: <br /> • Architectural drawings to scale with the new dormer on it including the window to scale <br /> and all of the architectural elements included-flashing,brackets, overhangs, etc. should <br /> be included. <br /> Mr.Neville asked for a tabling and motion to review future updates to the project for the <br /> September 8th meeting. Schuler motioned to reconvene as quickly as possible. The applicant <br /> objected to motion. Commissioner asked to amend the motion to table until September 8th to <br /> submit scale drawings. Dubowski seconded. Motion carried unanimously 5-0 <br /> COMMUNICATIONS <br /> None <br /> ^ . <br /> ADJOURNMENT <br /> Schuler moved,Ms. Egan-Reeves seconded. <br /> With no further business, the meeting adjourned at 7:11 PM. <br /> David Neville, Chair Stephen Holowicki,Economic and Community <br /> Development Coordinator <br /> Date: <br /> 2 <br />