11/10/2025 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

record from previous meetings. Dubowski commented on potential water pooling issues. Egan-Reeves moved to approve COA contingent upon previous inclusions of scalloping and brackets and that the dormers should be 2 feet apart, and width 9'3". Dubowski seconded. Motion carried 4-0. 2025-295 Prelim Plan;Stearns Row Townhomes Development; continuance Omalley prefaced by stating that his role was not to make a recommendation or not a recommendation of the project but to lend legal advice to the commission.That the standing application includes an application to rezone the parcel to a planned development. Mr. Holowicki began with a summary and reiteration of the slide deck presentation from last meeting and review of the project review area and a summary of parts of New Construction of guidelines 9.1 and 9.2 and Design Guidelines part 10. The applicant mentioned that the development begins at 189 feet from the ROW,the first 300 feet is subject to landmarks review.The roadway serving the project is 35 feet wide ROW with the intention to save most of the trees. He further restated to the commission to consider that the charter doesn't give much guidance on how to consider the proposal.The applicant asked for approval. Mr. Neville inquired about the appearance of the single-family home.The applicant discussed and then stated the original garage approval was off the table. The applicant Mr. Sommers discussed the project at length, assignment of Biddolph property and a lot split to convert a large parcel into single family homes and without using tax dollars. He further asked for a continuation including a lot split so that the lot will be sold as a single-family home. Mr. Dubowski emphasized that the development fronts should not be visible from the street. Mr. Neville emphasized that some of the landmark trees should remain. The public was asked to speak and for purposes of brevity to keep commentary short. Residents commented on a variety of issues, each under 9 minutes, all in opposition to the project. In order: Robert Sharp, Mary Ellen Hemann, Ed Wyles, Mr.Sapienza, and Carolyn Faulk all responded.The prevailing concern was that the applicant had not provided sample colors, materials, etc.to convey an appropriate project appearance.Applicant asked to have the project tabled until he could consult with legal counsel. Mr. Neville discussed the appearance of the single-family homes that they should be appropriate. Egan-Reeves motioned to table,seconded by Neville. Motion carried 4-0. COMMUNICATIONS None COMMUNICATIONS Holowicki mentioned that the Landmarks Commission is seeking representation from the residents to fill vacant seats. No one expressed interest. ADJOURN Adjournment. Motioned passed unanimously and adjourned at 8:40PM.