Laserfiche WebLink
signage, screening, and shared access with adjacent properties. Staff and the applicant clarified <br /> lighting controls, shared driveways,traffic study recommendations, parking, landscaping <br /> accuracy, and the status of signage coordination with the adjacent use. <br /> Several commissioners indicated they were not prepared to vote, citing the need for additional <br /> time to review building elevations, signage details, and traffic circulation, particularly along <br /> Stearns Road. It was stated that further review would be needed before making a <br /> recommendation to City Council. <br /> Mr.David made a motion to table PLAN-317-2025; Sheetz;29000 Lorain Rd.; seconded by Mr. <br /> Leon. <br /> Motion passed: 5-0 <br /> The Chair requested additional information from the applicant before taking action. It was stated <br /> that more time was needed to review the building elevations, particularly the south-facing façade <br /> along Lorain Road,which was described as appearing too blank despite the use of faux windows <br /> and awnings. The applicant and staff explained that internal operational constraints limited <br /> design alternatives but agreed to provide additional images and closer views to better illustrate <br /> the façade treatment. <br /> Additional concerns were raised regarding traffic flow and roadway striping on Lorain Road, <br /> outdoor sales areas and pedestrian/ADA accommodations, signage placement, general sign type <br /> (monument versus pylon), and overall landscaping appearance at a major city intersection.The <br /> applicant indicated that signage details were still being coordinated with an adjacent property but <br /> agreed to provide conceptual information showing likely placement and scale. <br /> The Chair stated a favorable inclination toward the project but emphasized the need for further <br /> review and clarification before making a recommendation. It was noted that roadway <br /> modifications related to traffic would be reviewed separately under the City Charter and could <br /> occur concurrently but were not part of the site plan approval. <br /> ADJOURNMENT <br /> With no further business before the board,the meeting adjourned at 8:35 p.m. <br /> MC) <br /> Tom David, Chair L n ilson,Administrative Assistant <br /> Approved: 1 / ? b 1 °-°a <br /> 4 <br />