My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04/06/2026 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
2026
>
Building and Zoning Board of Appeals
>
04/06/2026 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/11/2026 2:15:53 PM
Creation date
5/11/2026 2:14:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
explained that the increases were modest and necessary for visibility, branding, and site design, <br />particularly due to the layout and dual branding on the monument sign. The board discussed the <br />scale and necessity of the signage, noting the location at a major intersection and the importance <br />of visibility for the traveling public. The request was supported, with members indicating the <br />signage was reasonable and appropriate given the nature and location of the project. <br />Mr. Ammons made a motion to approve 415-2026; Sheetz; 29000 Lorain Rd.; seconded by Ms. <br />Galateanu. <br />Motion passed: 3-0 <br />417-2026; Slick City; 31369 Industrial Pkwy. <br />The case involved a request for a use variance to allow an indoor recreation facility (Slick City) <br />within an industrial zoning district, where such a use is not permitted. The applicant explained <br />the concept, emphasizing the need for large, high -ceiling space only available in industrial <br />buildings, the difficulty leasing the property under current zoning, and the economic benefits <br />including job creation and long-term tenancy. Additional context included prior discussions with <br />city staff and the argument that similar uses are allowed in nearby communities. <br />Legal counsel clarified that a use variance requires proof of unnecessary hardship, a higher <br />standard than typical variances, and that alternative processes (such as similar use determinations <br />or rezoning) were not under consideration in this case. Board discussion focused on concerns <br />about safety, compatibility with surrounding industrial uses, and the risk of introducing a family - <br />oriented, high -traffic use into an industrial area. Members also questioned whether the hardship <br />standard was met, noting that difficulty leasing the building did not constitute sufficient <br />hardship. Ultimately, the board expressed that the request was not appropriate under the use <br />variance criteria and suggested the applicant pursue other avenues through the city for relief. <br />Mr. Ammons made a motion to approve 417-2026; Slick City; 31369 industrial Pkwy.; seconded <br />by Ms. Galateanu. <br />Motion failed: 2-1 <br />ADJOURNMENT <br />A motion was made and seconded to excuse Ms. Shuler's absence; motion passed. <br />With no further business before the board, the meeting adjourned at 9:14 pm. <br />Ralph Mackey, Chair Lyn Wilson, Administrative Assistant <br />Approved: ✓ 1 " I I <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.