My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05/04/2026 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
2026
>
Building and Zoning Board of Appeals
>
05/04/2026 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/15/2026 1:05:03 PM
Creation date
7/15/2026 1:01:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
BUILDING & ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br />CITY OF NORTH OLMSTED <br />MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 4, 2026 <br />ROLL CALL <br />Mr. Mackey called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. in Council Chambers. <br />Present: Neil Ammons, Ralph Mackey, Roxana Galateanu, Peggy Berry, Gretchen Schuler <br />Staff: Director Michiel Wackers, Building Coordinator Katie Seeley, Law Director Michael <br />Gareau, Econ Dev Coordinator Steve Holowicki <br />MINUTES <br />The meeting minutes of April 6, 2026, were submitted for approval. All in favor, none opposed. <br />RESIDENTIAL APPEALS AND REQUESTS <br />426-2026; John and Grace Weglian; 6252 Pebblebrook Ln. <br />Case No. 426-2026, John and Grace Weglian, 6252 Pebble Brook Lane, was presented as a <br />request for a 7 -foot variance for the setback of a fence in the side and rear yards of a comer lot. <br />Code required a 20 -foot setback, and the applicant proposed a 13 -foot setback. The proposed <br />fence was described as a 6 -foot -high solid wood privacy fence. <br />Mr. Weglian stated that he and his wife purchased the property in September and that the rear <br />yard contained a legal above -ground pool. He explained that, although the pool had a locked gate <br />on the stairs, he was concerned that someone could still access the pool by climbing over the <br />side. He noted that the previous owners had relied on fake cameras and signage as a deterrent, <br />but he wanted a more secure option. He also stated that the fence would help protect the pool <br />area from unauthorized access and would help contain his dogs while preventing other animals <br />from entering the yard. <br />Staff explained that the property was a corner lot and that the requested variance was minimal. <br />Staff noted that existing vegetation already provided a visual barrier and that the proposed fence <br />would be located behind the tree line. Staff had no objection as long as the fence did not create <br />an obstruction for vehicles backing out of driveways or for pedestrians using the sidewalk. <br />The applicant confirmed that the fence would be placed inside the tree mound, so the view from <br />the street would be the street, sidewalk, tree line, and then the fence behind it. He further <br />explained that the fence would be solid wood, approximately six feet high, with no gaps between <br />boards, in order to prevent visibility into the yard and reduce the incentive for anyone to access <br />the pool. <br />Board members clarified that the variance request applied to the side yard setback along the <br />corner lot frontage, although the fence would also continue along the rear yard. The applicant <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.