Laserfiche WebLink
measurement challenges, survey accuracy, and whether sufficient information had been provided <br />to evaluate the variances as presented. <br />Mr. Mackey made a motion to approve the variance as submitted; seconded by Ms. Galateanu. <br />During deliberations, board members noted the irregular shape and topography of the lot and <br />expressed general support for new construction, particularly given the applicants' goal of single - <br />floor, aging -in -place living. It was observed that the rear yard variance affected only a small <br />portion of the home and would have minimal impact. Members reviewed surrounding setback <br />conditions and noted that nearby properties already showed varying setbacks, concluding the <br />proposal would not appear as a significant projection along the street. While acknowledging <br />neighbors' concerns and that the new home differed from the prior structure, the board indicated <br />the proposal met code requirements aside from the requested variances and represented a <br />practical solution given the site constraints. <br />Motion Passed: 4-0 <br />ADJOURNMENT <br />With no further business before the board, the meeting adjourned at 8:13pm. <br />Neil Ammons, Vice Chair <br />Approved: 9 ( a- f a -o - <br />Lyn Wilson, Administrative Assistant <br />