03/22/1988 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES - MARCH 22, 1988. I. ROLL CALL: Chairman Morgan called the meeting to order at 8:25 p.m. Present: M. Betts, R. Bierman, B. Gorris, J. Thomas, E. Traczyk, and T. Morgan. . Also Fresent: Assistant Law Director J. Dubelko, Building Commissioner • C. Conway, Consulting City Engineer T. Boyer, and Clerk of Commissions B. Oring. II. REVIEW AND.CORRECTION OF MTNUTES: ' M. Betts moved to approve the minutes.:of the North Olmsted Pianning Commis- sion meeting dated March 8,.1988 as submitted, seconded by J. Thomas, and unanimously approve.d.. III. BUILDING DEPARTMENT REQUESTS: 1) Lauren Hill P1aza,.24106 Lorain Road . Proposal.to construct shopping center. (Variance granted by the Boarcl of Zoning Appeals. January.6, :1988). Heard by Architectural Board of Review March 16, 1988. Mr. Seaman, ;architect., .presented. revised plans reflecting the recommenda- ' tions' of''theAr'chitectural, Board'?of'Review: 1) the §ix foot.board on board fefice will be eontinuous along the riorth side of the fire access drive arid>they'will,request a variance if it is.necessary (at this'point' Assistant.Law Director,I)Dubelko advised that the Building Commissioner determined that since:the fence runs along between residential and - commercial property a:variance.would not_.tbe required); dumpster-on the-_ . east side of the property will,,be enclosed; six 15 foot high pole. lights'. will be installed on,:the.northern edge:of•: the fire access drive so the light will.be directed:;taward-the building (this is not shown on the plan as yet); block on. the rear wall will be integrally colored; re- garding the screening.,`of the;'`mechanical'.units, they have.revised tHe . end wall ori the soutH:=sa that`'it-will be 20 feet above the-finished floor in order to.screen the;mechanical units, but the north and west walls have not been-revised?since these units will be.at least 100 feet minimum from the residential;?;property line, are..the?size.of -a.residential . unit 00 iriches high.„on a:T4?'inch curb) . and they beleive the existing .-vegetation ?wi1T be s.ufficient`-:screening. ,' ?Mr':-: Thomas stated that the screen in the rear was as-much for sound as°for sight. Mr. Morgan read portions of a-lettex from Mr. D. Pattison:(attached) which called atten- .. tion to the non-conforming `features of the,'adjacent lots; portions of -- which this deve'lopment will be acquiring; and stating that' the 'Commis- sion -is ?iiot .obligated to..'create these non-conforming parcels. rLaw.Director Gareau has responded :to:,.thisletter'•.falso'_attached)- refutiiig some':of the -•statements ,.made -in Mr: -,Pattison's letter. Mr. Morgan advised that this proposal has been before the Commission :for several meetings, and he believes that this final proposal is the.best compromise as to what