My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07/23/1996 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
1996
>
1996 Planning Commission
>
07/23/1996 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:33:17 PM
Creation date
1/29/2019 9:02:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
1996
Board Name
Planning Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
7/23/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
? <br />CITY OF NORTH OLMSTED <br />PLANNING COMIVIISSION <br />MIlNUTES - NLY 23,`1996 <br />I. ROLL CALL: <br />Chairmau Tallon called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. <br />Present: D. Cameron Alston, T. Brennan, T. Herbster, A. Manving, K. O'Rourke, and R Tallon. <br />Absent: R Koeth. Also Present: City Engineer Deiclvnanu, Assistant Building Commissioner Rymarczyk, and Clerk of <br />Commissions Oring. <br />II. REVIEW AND CORRECTION OF NIINUTES: <br />R Tallon moved to approve the minutes of July 9, 1996, seconded by K. O'Rourke, and unanimously <br />approved. <br />III. BLTILDING DEPARTMENT REQLTESTS: <br />1) Harsax Managemeut Co., property located on the south side of Lorain Road, east of North Olmsted <br />Industrial Parkway, permanent parcel number 234-09-003. <br />Proposal to construct two office/warehouse buildings in two phases. <br />Heard by architectural review board Ju1y 17, 1996. <br />Mr. Howe, architect, aud Mr. Sacks, owner, presented revised site and landscape plans. Mr. Howe <br />noted that the dumpster had been relocated to the rear of the property as requested and the revised <br />landscape plan must be reviewed by Mr. Zergott of the architectural review board. He clarified that this <br />plan just covers the first phase. He explained that, since he had just received comments from the forester <br />this evening, they have not been addressed; however, he will turn these notes over to his landscape <br />arclutect. The revised plan indicates the trees that can be saved as well as new plantings which have <br />been added along with mounding. Regard,ing the suggestions of the architectural review board, they <br />have carried glass around the west end of the bu.ilding as requested, as well as repeating that treatment <br />on the other end of the building. He presented cuts of the parking lot fixtures which must also be sent to <br />Ms. I{rieger of the architectural review board for her review. Mr. Sacks advised that they have been <br />talking to the neighbor about buying his property, but no agreement has been reached; but if they can <br />come to terms, the building will be enlarged accordingly. He clarified that the parcel where the house is <br />located is approximately 60 feet wide by 240 feet. Tlie members agreed that this house could not be <br />used for anytlung else, tind questioned if the negoiations are serious. Mr. Sacks stated that they are <br />about $10,000.00 apart and believed it was better than a 50% possibility. The offer is based on tax <br />values,and they did not hire an independent appraiser. If they do get this lot, two more bays could be <br />added and the driveways could be tied together in order to have two egresses from the drive on the <br />Industrial Parkway (the drive on Lorain Road would remain). Mr. Tallon clarified that they really should <br />have two drives with this plan, but the commission could grant a variance to allow only one if the house <br />purchase fell through. The second building would remain as planned. Mr. Brennan noted that the light <br />was forward throw, and if the residence remained, it should be shielded. Mr. Howe agreed that the <br />lights could be shielded if necessary. Chainuan Tallon noted that zero illumination was usually required <br />at the property line. He clarified if they were able to buy the property and extend the building, the <br />proposal would not have to return to the commission as long as everything remains exactly the same. <br />R. Tallon moved to approve Harsax Management Co. proposal, property located on the south side of <br />Lorain Road, east of North Olmsted Industrial Parkway, permanent parcel number 234-09-003 to <br />construct two o?'ice/warehouse buildiugs in two phases. It is noted that this is phase one, and the
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.