Laserfiche WebLink
MSNU'I'ES OF A MF.ETING OF THE PLANNIIVG Ct?MKISSION OF THE <br />CITY CF N9RTH ObMSTED., OHIO HELD AT 8s0O P. M. <br />MAY 22, 1956 <br />Present were IKessx°s. Votava' Lewi.s,, Esgar' Grtpmneys Haaanatn,. <br />Mr. & Mss. F. J. McCrone requested t,ksat 'three 43P lots on Wellesley Avenue <br />be re-divicled iaato two 65' lots. The sub-division was approvedo . <br />Mr. Leroy Harris presented a plat for 32 ].ots on LeBern Drive for dedicatiora. <br />Mr. Votana made a motion that the P],arnirag Ccmmission recommend to City <br />Council that the plat be accepted for ciedication, when a borqd has been secured <br />to covex the crost of a]1 street iffipxovements.. Mre Grantney secaneled the motion. <br />No'tion was passed. I <br />Messrs. Greenfields Roth & Wheeler of G-L Deve],opment Co. (see minutes of last <br />meet3ng) appeared befare the P1anra$ng Commmissiotn agains coracerx?ing tile puffipixtg <br />atatiora for septic tank effluente Engineers Cloyd & Dean would not make ariy <br />recommendations eitP?er t'or or against such an arrangement. Ameetirag of same <br />of the City of'ficials with Mx°o Dean is scheduled fcyr next Thtarsday. Z'he gump- <br />ing etation wiU 1oe farther diSCuBsed at that time. Mr. Greenfield was told <br />that it is extr?mely daxbtful if the Pumping 3tatian vrou3d be approved9 unless <br />the cost of maintenance of the pumping was borne byresidents ot' the develog9- <br />ment . <br />Mra. Theresa Shi4z requosteci taer lot af 2180 width on the east side of Clagrie <br />Road near Maple Ridge, be subdivided into $wo 651 lots and one $$° lot. The <br />- sub-divisian was approvedo - <br />Mr. Stephen A. Kadax requested that six 45e lots on the north side of Esther <br />Aveme (sxb-lots 55 through 60) be re-divided itito txo 60' lots and tbree 501 <br />lat s. The sub-cl3v3.sion was approeed. <br />Messra. Joaeph Lindsay and Peter Kroxtschn3.tt of IC & I, Builders, Inc, appeared <br />in a 3oint meet3ng between City Council and the Planning C ssion, concern3ng <br />annexation of their property (see minutes of last meetirig)o There was oonsiderab].e <br />discuss.i.ore both for and against annexation. A motion was anade by Dr. Levris aatd <br />3econded by Mr.°. Grumney $hat the Plamirig Comrnissior? give an opinion stating <br />that sacb a develoyment would be d,esi.a•ab].e in North Olmstect prov3.ding it is <br />annexed into ATorrth Olm9ted. Motion was passed unaraimouslg. <br />Urnofficia71y, the cauneil members present were iri favor of the devslopment byr <br />ama3ority of three to two. Messrs. Kramer, Deckar, Baker were in favor, <br />Messrs. Criders. AacDonald were in opposition. <br />The meeting ad j ourne dat 10:34 P. M. <br />• ?? ? <br />Secr ry C , ixmm