11/13/1962 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

t' C'Ui#g .?f Wvx#4 MXms#rb, 04iv eAt,O CITI.r OF NQRTH OUTISTID BOART) Or ZUNZNG A. PELS REGrJLAR LIPIETZNG F?` AT TF-IE, CITY f::!1?L NOVM'lB:rR 133 1962 Meeting was called to order at 7:40 P.M, Members present: TuIessrs. Greene, 14organ, Klinite. Members absenta Messrs, Byers, Smitlim .A,1so presenta ti:ro Gundv, Building CommissionAr Interested Neighbors - A,ppellants Nos. l, 2, & 3a Minutes oi Qctober 109 1962 meeting read arld approved aiter Fara. 4 in reFerence to A;.?pellant Ido. l, Job-n Ch-T-kowski9 was corrected. Law Dixector had decided in favor of A,ppellant in tha-t origiiial request for perrnit, 9.Itho not acccmpanied by details, had been requested prior to the change in Code. lU1rv Gundy was requested by our Tsaw Director to issue the necessar?J perinit. Appellants Nos. 1& 2 a: Request of Charles Qverman, 5331 Be7°kshire Dr., N. Olm° st?ec., Qlzio, for erecticn of a 71 x lOt tool stiorage builcling on a poured concrete ba.se, and. request of 9lndrew H. Hugel, Jr., 5345 Berkshire Dr., N. 0lmsted, Ohio., for erection of a fence with s'uorage sDa.ce, were discussed as one unit. Intera pretation of tool storage bu1.11di.ng and storage space was requested of the Board as -there is nothing specific t?nder this title in the Zonirlg Qrdinancem Bo-th listruc-turssif are alreaca,y built on the above respective properties and both built without ap_,rmit. Both had been constructed at time applica.tion for permit was received, oUmiers adv?sing they tiaere not aware that 4ermit was requireda N r. Gundy advised that a neighbor of both a.ppellants, neighbor requesting that his na-rae be withheld, had come to him Troicing his objection to these structures and asking if lZe could have a fence erected on his property li.ne to obscure these structurese This p?r'ticular n.eighbor was not present at meetingo No o'ujection.s tqere vciced by other neighbors presente Board could no'u arrige at a decision as to coverage under our present 'Loning Qrd.in.ance and askecl_ 'llhat we hear from cur Law Director, Our Law Directo•r asked for time -to study the Zoni.ng Qrdinar_ce specifica7_7.y for these s-tructures and asked that decision be tabled until ou.r next regular nee?ing, Dec, ?.. 1962, at which time he hoped to have arrived at a decisionm Nc one is being harmed by the delay as struc-cures are already located. Tnterpretation 1*7; t,he Law Director will be decisiveo A,ppellant No. 3: Request Yy Charles J. and AXi-n I1ia Cullen, 4764 FlehartY Pcl., R. Q mste , 00 o'auild a 11; x 20 foot garage 3 feet from the side lot line instead oi t'ne reqiired 5' as set i orth in the Zoning Ordm oi the City of I3orth Olmsted, Section 1151.04, 1'arae "C", pa ge 33+ Aippellant advised that his 1ot is oray 501 wide and it would be very cii.Ffi-cuit to string in and out of the garage tirithout tiais 2' requested variance. -1-