10/27/1964 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

CITY OF NOR.'I'H C?LMSTED -BQAkD OF ZC3RIING APY:EALS SFECIAL RfIEETTNG HELD ?T 'EHE CITY HALL - OCTUBER 27, 1964 Meeting called to order at 7:40 p.m. Members present; Messrs. Byers, Greene, Schaaf, N1rs. Eia.l1 Member absent: Mr. Klinite Also absent: 2v1r. Gundy, Buslding Comtnissioner 1. Appe].lant: Bruscixlo Development, 15411 Chatfield jive. Cleveland, 0. Ref: Rear Yard Setback variances on sublots 70, 74, ?S, 78, 83 and 85 on Deerfield Urive and Sublot 13 on Fawn Drive in the hianning Camnbell Subdivision #89 Section 1. Request is in violation oi Zoning Ordinance 62-33, ChalDter 1163, sub-para- graph 1163.01, ealliciz stipulates fifty feet. hlr. Ray Bruscino represented Bruscino Development, and requested that each lot setback variance be for ten f eet. Mre and Nirs. Paul Lusf:er, 24833 Chase Drive were present. Mrs. Luster questioned the variance on the grounds that the smaller back yards would tend to restrict children's play activities. Mr. Schaai commented that he believed the ]land area of the back yards seemed to b e adequate. Mr. Luster questioned whether the v ariance request would a.f£ect the poor drainage condition existing at the rear of his property. Then Councilman Jack Pol.tz asked that the v ariance be denied because the builder had not provided recreation areas as originally contemplated. It was then pointed out by Mr. Bruscino that his company tivas not the original developer, and that he had made no such commitmeiat. Mr. Foltz withdreiv his objection. Nire Schaaf said the city eiagineer should be conte.cted pertaining to the drainage situation. 1vlrs. Luster said she would have Yio ob jec- tion to tlie variance if the drainage problem could be corrected. Mr. Bruscino said he would cooperate with the city engineer in correctsng the drainage problem. At this point, Mr. Labas, city engineer, was asked to appear. Subsequently, it ivas agreed that Mr. Bruscino and interested property oivners vuould submit a letter to the city enbineer to nave the grading work done to elitninate the drainage problem on the rear of sublots 45 to 64 on Chase Drive. Mr. Greene moved that the variances be granted for ten f eet rear yard se-tback on the sublots in question. Mr. Schaaf seconded. Vote ivas unanimous. 2. Appellant; 3ruscino Development, 15411 Chatfield five. Cleveland, 0. Ref: Side street setback variance request on co rner sublots Nos. 1, 217 22, 37, 57 in the Michael Varady Subdivision. Request is in violation of Zoning Ordinance 62-33, Chanter 1159, paragraph 1159.02, which stipulates fifty feet.